Comments on: Spy Scandal Indictments http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/ Korea From North to South Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:54:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ChickenHead http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-431002 ChickenHead Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:07:43 +0000 http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/#comment-431002 A little checkbox next to the submit button that says, "I am human" would not be inconvenient for skinjobs but would filter out all the light AI. Heavy AI isn't interested in spamming blogs... and anything in between that can negotiate a random checkbox is worth interacting with. A little checkbox next to the submit button that says, “I am human” would not be inconvenient for skinjobs but would filter out all the light AI.

Heavy AI isn’t interested in spamming blogs… and anything in between that can negotiate a random checkbox is worth interacting with.

]]> By: GI Korea http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-430998 GI Korea Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:31:49 +0000 http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/#comment-430998 Glans, JoeC is spot on with his explanation. I have two different ways of catching spam comments. <a href="http://www.projecthoneypot.com/" rel="nofollow">Project Honey Pot</a> and Akismet which is a program built into Wordpress. Before I signed up for Project Honey Pot I was getting about a 1,000 spam comments a day in Akismet. It is incredible the amount of spammers floating around the Internet. Unfortunately some of these spam comments get by both Project Honey Pot and Akismet. When I see them I add their IP address of banned IP addresses on the site. Considering the fact I have open commenting and don't force people to register to comment the spam really isn't too bad on the site. Glans, JoeC is spot on with his explanation. I have two different ways of catching spam comments. Project Honey Pot and Akismet which is a program built into WordPress. Before I signed up for Project Honey Pot I was getting about a 1,000 spam comments a day in Akismet. It is incredible the amount of spammers floating around the Internet. Unfortunately some of these spam comments get by both Project Honey Pot and Akismet. When I see them I add their IP address of banned IP addresses on the site. Considering the fact I have open commenting and don’t force people to register to comment the spam really isn’t too bad on the site.

]]> By: USinKorea http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-430937 USinKorea Wed, 31 Aug 2011 23:18:04 +0000 http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/#comment-430937 They are a major pain in the neck. That is why I commented a fantasy the other day about wishing there was a widget you could add to a blog that would seek out a spammer's computer and put malware on it. It is already annoying to have to scan through a 100 or 200 spam comments a day in the spam filter, but now you have to scan all comments to see which ones got through. They are a major pain in the neck.

That is why I commented a fantasy the other day about wishing there was a widget you could add to a blog that would seek out a spammer’s computer and put malware on it.

It is already annoying to have to scan through a 100 or 200 spam comments a day in the spam filter, but now you have to scan all comments to see which ones got through.

]]> By: JoeC http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-430931 JoeC Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:42:55 +0000 http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/#comment-430931 #6 They are a sort of SPAM. They are derived from what are called "bots", as in robots. Bots are programs that scan through the internet following all paths (links) looking for information. They often do useful work. Google uses bots to crawl through the internet to find new webpages to add to its search collection database. Web etiquette actually recognizes and allows the bot activity. But, webmasters can add a code in their webpages that denies permission for bots to crawl their sites. Sort of like "No Trespassing" sign. Of course, there are people in the real world who don't respect that either. Plus, that would defeat the purpose of a website where you want search engines to find many links to your site, places it high in the rankings list and helps get you more readers. In this case, these SPAM bots are designed to look for blog sites. Maybe, specific types of blog sites like Word Press, where they understand the underlying structure and layout. They appear to target the archive and probably pick random topics. They carry payloads of generic, natural language "comments" that may seem relevant to the topic at first to get people to read them. It's only after you read it realize its irrelevance. They don't appear to target specific subject matters, like military related discussions, but that is easy enough to do if they wanted. One clue as to their purpose: if you pass your mouse over the poster's name, you will find it is a link to some commercial product website, which is the purpose of most SPAM via email. Whether what's at that link is an actual product they want to get your attention to, or a phishing redirection is another possibility, if you want to follow that rabbit down the hole. #6

They are a sort of SPAM. They are derived from what are called “bots”, as in robots. Bots are programs that scan through the internet following all paths (links) looking for information. They often do useful work. Google uses bots to crawl through the internet to find new webpages to add to its search collection database. Web etiquette actually recognizes and allows the bot activity. But, webmasters can add a code in their webpages that denies permission for bots to crawl their sites. Sort of like “No Trespassing” sign. Of course, there are people in the real world who don’t respect that either. Plus, that would defeat the purpose of a website where you want search engines to find many links to your site, places it high in the rankings list and helps get you more readers.

In this case, these SPAM bots are designed to look for blog sites. Maybe, specific types of blog sites like Word Press, where they understand the underlying structure and layout. They appear to target the archive and probably pick random topics. They carry payloads of generic, natural language “comments” that may seem relevant to the topic at first to get people to read them. It’s only after you read it realize its irrelevance. They don’t appear to target specific subject matters, like military related discussions, but that is easy enough to do if they wanted.

One clue as to their purpose: if you pass your mouse over the poster’s name, you will find it is a link to some commercial product website, which is the purpose of most SPAM via email. Whether what’s at that link is an actual product they want to get your attention to, or a phishing redirection is another possibility, if you want to follow that rabbit down the hole.

]]> By: Glans http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-430924 Glans Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:38:10 +0000 http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/#comment-430924 Could some internet sophisticate explain this? Inane comments like Leonard Wellington 5 seem to be more common lately. It looks like some kind of spam, but what's it for? Is he hoping to collect IP addresses of people interested in Korea and the military? Could some internet sophisticate explain this? Inane comments like Leonard Wellington 5 seem to be more common lately. It looks like some kind of spam, but what’s it for? Is he hoping to collect IP addresses of people interested in Korea and the military?

]]> By: OneFreeKorea » Which ‘Major Government Offices’ Contained N. Korean Moles? http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-90035 OneFreeKorea » Which ‘Major Government Offices’ Contained N. Korean Moles? Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:27:15 +0000 http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/#comment-90035 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Spy Scandal Indictments at ROK Drop said, [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] Spy Scandal Indictments at ROK Drop said, [...]

]]> By: MilBlogs (Daily Archive) http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-33770 MilBlogs (Daily Archive) Wed, 09 May 2007 08:44:36 +0000 http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/#comment-33770 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] also have the Fifth Column in South Korea, organized by North Korean agents that want to stop the move because North Korea wants to keep 2ID and USFK locked into their current [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] also have the Fifth Column in South Korea, organized by North Korean agents that want to stop the move because North Korea wants to keep 2ID and USFK locked into their current [...]

]]> By: Camp Humphreys Relocation to Be Delayed? at ROK Drop http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-1041 Camp Humphreys Relocation to Be Delayed? at ROK Drop Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:07:38 +0000 http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/#comment-1041 [...] Those of us who have served in Korea for awhile knew the 2008 timeline wasn’t going to happen, but 2013 give me a break? The Korean government has never wanted to allow the USFK relocation to Camp Humphreys just like they have never really wanted to take operational control from USFK either. Both the Yongsan and the operational control issues have long served as great cannonfodder by South Korean politicians looking to demagoge the issue to their own political advantage. Plus the Koreans have never wanted to fully fund the move despite all the prime real estate they are gaining from the closed out USFK facilities. Heck they won’t even properly fund the US-ROK Alliance while giving over a billion dollars to North Korea a year! You also have the Fifth Column in South Korea, organized by North Korean agents that want to stop the move because North Korea wants to keep 2ID and USFK locked into their current locations that are well within artillery range of North Korea which would mean their easy destruction during war time. Additionally the locations of the bases, particularly Yongsan have been completely surrounded by urban cities which has led to accidents and incidents with the Korean public that gets demagoged by the North Korean sponsored anti-US activists groups in order to draw a wedge between USFK and the general Korean public. The consolidation of US forces would remove all US forces out of North Korean artillery range and additionally under the ballistic missile protection of US Army PATRIOT missile batteries. This would create better force protection for USFK forces along with giving USFK commanders more flexibility during war time. [...] [...] Those of us who have served in Korea for awhile knew the 2008 timeline wasn’t going to happen, but 2013 give me a break? The Korean government has never wanted to allow the USFK relocation to Camp Humphreys just like they have never really wanted to take operational control from USFK either. Both the Yongsan and the operational control issues have long served as great cannonfodder by South Korean politicians looking to demagoge the issue to their own political advantage. Plus the Koreans have never wanted to fully fund the move despite all the prime real estate they are gaining from the closed out USFK facilities. Heck they won’t even properly fund the US-ROK Alliance while giving over a billion dollars to North Korea a year! You also have the Fifth Column in South Korea, organized by North Korean agents that want to stop the move because North Korea wants to keep 2ID and USFK locked into their current locations that are well within artillery range of North Korea which would mean their easy destruction during war time. Additionally the locations of the bases, particularly Yongsan have been completely surrounded by urban cities which has led to accidents and incidents with the Korean public that gets demagoged by the North Korean sponsored anti-US activists groups in order to draw a wedge between USFK and the general Korean public. The consolidation of US forces would remove all US forces out of North Korean artillery range and additionally under the ballistic missile protection of US Army PATRIOT missile batteries. This would create better force protection for USFK forces along with giving USFK commanders more flexibility during war time. [...]

]]> By: Pyeongtaek Residents Weigh In on USFK Relocation at ROK Drop http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-1029 Pyeongtaek Residents Weigh In on USFK Relocation at ROK Drop Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:21:16 +0000 http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/10/spy-scandal-indictments/#comment-1029 [...] First of all let me say I am always skeptical of polls taken in Korea, but the results on this one sound about right.  Basically you have over 60% of the population who either support or don’t care one way or the other about the relocation of USFK to Camp Humphreys.  I actually find these numbers encouraging because for the last year the USFK relocation to Camp Humphreys has been hit with constant anti-US demonstrations organized by North Korean agents and the issue has been demagoged continuously by Korean activists and politicians to advance their own agendas.  Heck the demagoging of the Camp Humphreys issue was even picked up by American leftist Cindy Sheehan.  Despite all of this the leftists and spies still couldn’t sway the majority of public opinion in Pyeongtaek against the relocation.  It is an encouraging sign that the South Korean love affair with leftism and anti-Americanism is slowly waning. [...] [...] First of all let me say I am always skeptical of polls taken in Korea, but the results on this one sound about right.  Basically you have over 60% of the population who either support or don’t care one way or the other about the relocation of USFK to Camp Humphreys.  I actually find these numbers encouraging because for the last year the USFK relocation to Camp Humphreys has been hit with constant anti-US demonstrations organized by North Korean agents and the issue has been demagoged continuously by Korean activists and politicians to advance their own agendas.  Heck the demagoging of the Camp Humphreys issue was even picked up by American leftist Cindy Sheehan.  Despite all of this the leftists and spies still couldn’t sway the majority of public opinion in Pyeongtaek against the relocation.  It is an encouraging sign that the South Korean love affair with leftism and anti-Americanism is slowly waning. [...]

]]>