<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camp Humphreys Relocation to Be Delayed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/</link>
	<description>Korea From North to South</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:26:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Korea Continues to Delay Cost Sharing Deal</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-181266</link>
		<dc:creator>Korea Continues to Delay Cost Sharing Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/#comment-181266</guid>
		<description>[...] Korean government has never wanted the USFK relocation to happen for a variety of reasons and the only reason it has gotten as far as it has was because of former Defense Secretary Donald [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Korean government has never wanted the USFK relocation to happen for a variety of reasons and the only reason it has gotten as far as it has was because of former Defense Secretary Donald [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Will Be Built First Songdo or Camp Humphreys?</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-175207</link>
		<dc:creator>What Will Be Built First Songdo or Camp Humphreys?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/#comment-175207</guid>
		<description>[...] city on reclaimed ocean to the current progress to expand Camp Humphreys which has been hit with delay after delay by the Korean government. The Camp Humphreys expansion was agreed upon in 2004 and if [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] city on reclaimed ocean to the current progress to expand Camp Humphreys which has been hit with delay after delay by the Korean government. The Camp Humphreys expansion was agreed upon in 2004 and if [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camp Humphrey Relocation Could Be Delayed to 2016</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-168268</link>
		<dc:creator>Camp Humphrey Relocation Could Be Delayed to 2016</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/#comment-168268</guid>
		<description>[...] Korean government has never wanted the USFK relocation to happen for a variety of reasons and the only reason it has gotten as far as it has was because of former Defense Secretary Donald [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Korean government has never wanted the USFK relocation to happen for a variety of reasons and the only reason it has gotten as far as it has was because of former Defense Secretary Donald [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Deadline for North Korea to Violate is Announced at ROK Drop</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-118056</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Deadline for North Korea to Violate is Announced at ROK Drop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/#comment-118056</guid>
		<description>[...] it just me or is are the North Korean nuclear talks strangely similar to USFK transformation and war time control talks with South Korea?Â  It is a constant delay game with the United States [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it just me or is are the North Korean nuclear talks strangely similar to USFK transformation and war time control talks with South Korea?Â  It is a constant delay game with the United States [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Civic Groups "Vanguard of Smear Campaigns" at ROK Drop</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-44899</link>
		<dc:creator>Civic Groups "Vanguard of Smear Campaigns" at ROK Drop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/#comment-44899</guid>
		<description>[...] Range protests.  The tactics of these groups continues this day with their activities to stop the USFK relocation at Camp Humphreys along with their claims of pollution on vacated USFK [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Range protests.  The tactics of these groups continues this day with their activities to stop the USFK relocation at Camp Humphreys along with their claims of pollution on vacated USFK [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: US Congressmen Challenge US-ROK FTA at ROK Drop</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-35851</link>
		<dc:creator>US Congressmen Challenge US-ROK FTA at ROK Drop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 23:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/#comment-35851</guid>
		<description>[...] last year after long negotiations only to be unilaterally changed by the Korean government (see here &amp; here) when they saw an opportunity to do so to their advantage when former Secretary of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last year after long negotiations only to be unilaterally changed by the Korean government (see here &amp; here) when they saw an opportunity to do so to their advantage when former Secretary of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Abnormal&#8221; Japan at ROK Drop</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-26789</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Abnormal&#8221; Japan at ROK Drop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/#comment-26789</guid>
		<description>[...] First of all, isnâ€™t unilaterally declaring that the Camp Humphreys relocation is going to be delayed by 5 years from the agreed upon date between the US and Korean governments and then the USFK commander first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First of all, isnâ€™t unilaterally declaring that the Camp Humphreys relocation is going to be delayed by 5 years from the agreed upon date between the US and Korean governments and then the USFK commander first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MilBlogs (Daily Archive)</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-22463</link>
		<dc:creator>MilBlogs (Daily Archive)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 23:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/#comment-22463</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] the Korean government is all about maintaining the status quo for reasons I have listed before here. Apparently the Foreign Ministry doesn&#039;t have the courage to tell General Bell what they think [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] the Korean government is all about maintaining the status quo for reasons I have listed before here. Apparently the Foreign Ministry doesn&#8217;t have the courage to tell General Bell what they think [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Policy of Irrelevancy at ROK Drop</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-3574</link>
		<dc:creator>The Policy of Irrelevancy at ROK Drop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/#comment-3574</guid>
		<description>[...] If the Korean government cherished the US-ROK alliance so much then why did the Korean government unilaterally declare that the Camp Humphreys relocation is going to be delayed by 5 years from the agreed upon date and then not notify the USFK commander?Â  General Bell first found out about the decision by reading the newspaper.Â  If the Korean government cared about the US-ROK alliance why did they cut the agreed upon money for the upkeep of the US-ROK alliance only weeks after making a cost sharing agreement?Â  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If the Korean government cherished the US-ROK alliance so much then why did the Korean government unilaterally declare that the Camp Humphreys relocation is going to be delayed by 5 years from the agreed upon date and then not notify the USFK commander?Â  General Bell first found out about the decision by reading the newspaper.Â  If the Korean government cared about the US-ROK alliance why did they cut the agreed upon money for the upkeep of the US-ROK alliance only weeks after making a cost sharing agreement?Â  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Korean Government Warns USFK Commander Over &#8220;Undiplomatic&#8221; Remarks at ROK Drop</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-2991</link>
		<dc:creator>Korean Government Warns USFK Commander Over &#8220;Undiplomatic&#8221; Remarks at ROK Drop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2006/12/13/camp-humphreys-relocation-to-be-delayed/#comment-2991</guid>
		<description>[...] Why do I say General Bell is doing his job well you may ask?Â  It is because he is pissing off the Korean government which is a sure sign that he is not about maintaining the status quo, business as usual USFK relationship in Korea and the Foreign Ministry knows it.Â  Remember the Korean government is all about maintaining the status quo for reasons I have listed before here.Â  Apparently the Foreign Ministry doesn&#8217;t have the courage to tell General Bell what they think about him themselves, so in order to under cut him, the ministry has decided to complain to the State Department representative visiting Seoul about him.Â  I hope the State Department won&#8217;t entertain this crap from the Korean Foreign Ministry, but the State Department has a track record for entertaining characters that they shouldn&#8217;t.Â  Need I bring up Madeline Albright toasting Kim Jong-il for one obvious example? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why do I say General Bell is doing his job well you may ask?Â  It is because he is pissing off the Korean government which is a sure sign that he is not about maintaining the status quo, business as usual USFK relationship in Korea and the Foreign Ministry knows it.Â  Remember the Korean government is all about maintaining the status quo for reasons I have listed before here.Â  Apparently the Foreign Ministry doesn&#8217;t have the courage to tell General Bell what they think about him themselves, so in order to under cut him, the ministry has decided to complain to the State Department representative visiting Seoul about him.Â  I hope the State Department won&#8217;t entertain this crap from the Korean Foreign Ministry, but the State Department has a track record for entertaining characters that they shouldn&#8217;t.Â  Need I bring up Madeline Albright toasting Kim Jong-il for one obvious example? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

