By So claims the German newspaper the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Here is an english language translation of the article. This is the headline paragraph of the article:
“America’s accusations against North Korea are on very shaky ground … A rumor has circulated for years among representatives of the security printing industry and counterfeiting investigators that it is the American CIA that prints the Supernotes at a secret printing facility.â€
Yes foks an unsubstantiated rumor that cannot be proven in anyway means that American sanctions on North Korea due to it’s counterfeiting of US currency is on "shaky ground". How can an editor at a major German newspaper agree to print something like this? I heard a rumor that Elvis was secretly living with Kim Jong-il and were set to release a debut duet single together entitled "Don’t Step on My Kaeseong Made Shoes". Don’t question me the tooth fairy told me. Will the German media print this as front page news as well? This FAZ article is even less credible than the AP citing a North Korean newspaper to confirm their No Gun-ri article or using Jamil Hussein to confirm their Iraq reporting.
The basis of the German claims is that North Korea is too poor and technologically backward country to be able to produce such high quality counterfeit notes, nevermind that they have the technology to operate an advanced ballistic missile and nuclear weapons programs. Also never mind the fact that North Korean diplomats have been caught with US counterfeit currency. Despite all the overwhelming evidence proving that the North Koreans are counterfeiting US currency the FAZ of course believes it is the CIA that is counterfeiting our own US currency to fund secret operations around the world. No word yet from the German media if they believe that the counterfeit US notes from the CIA were used to purchase the demolition charges that brought down the World Trade Center.
I think this post from One Free Korea who broke the story best explains this article:
On the one hand, it’s pretty damned disturbing when this kind of steaming sheisswurst gets wrapped in newspaper and served worldwide, and it sort of puts all of that talk about Iraq having “alienated our European allies†in context. On the other hand, enlightenment is never bad, and in this case, I’ve been enlightened a bit more about how history plays on a continuous loop: dour German intellectuals identify and smear a scapegoat; the smears then spread, fester, and break out into painful sores for next several decades. Today, Americans have become the world’s new Jews, and it’s no point asking why they hate us. What matters is that they’ve made up their minds to.
Yes folks, Americans may very well be the new Jews. May sure you read the rest of OFK’s post.
It is the sad reality. No mistake...
10:59 am on January 23rd, 2007 1
GI Korea,
Many German newspapers work with the CIA. Now that the "9-11 inside job" movement is gaining momentum, disinformation must be thrown into the info-sphere to clutter, confuse, and discredit notions of false-flag chicanery (9-11 inside job) … in order to buy time in capitalizing on America's new bloodthirst for killing ragheads; in other words … support for Iran's bombing.
Yes, we know you collude with the "official explantion" of 9-11 — since it safeguards your BX privileges.
Even I want to be lulled into your comforting lala land … because the conspiracy is simply too monstrous to even conceive.
So, please GI … help me understand the following: Larry Silverstein, the owner of the world trade center complex, (by his un-thinking mistake) admits on record that he gave permission to “pull†WTC building 7 just a few hours after the twin tower collapse. Boom … down went building 7 supposedly because the structure was dangerously cantilevered after the twin-tower collapse. Such a controlled demolition of building 7, however, takes weeks, if not months to pre-plan and set-up. Do you think it’s possible that during the horror and confusion, a demolition team was quickly assembled to execute the demolition within a few hours?
Must we surmise by pure logic … that WTC building 7 was pre-rigged with explosives — just as the twin towers might have been? Or, can you save the day … and install reasonable doubt in my mind? Please, I want to doubt! Instead of obsessing with the irrelevant No Gun Ri story, you could put your mind to better service, and help us all believe the official 9-11 story.
The New American Century cabal self-admittedly believes there is a short window of opportunity to spread American influence and dominance around the world in order to install a "sustainable" world. They admittedly said the stupid masses need to be jump-started and galvanized by a “Pearl Harbor†event; an event that mobilizes America into action and will be continuously bolstered by sentimental country songs about “NEVER FORGETTINGâ€. These pragmatic men, will sacrifice American lives for the “greater good". I bet they might even sacrifice YOU!
Many will collude for big profits. Silverstein made a killing on the World Trade Center insurance. Others, like you will collude for BX privileges. I personally respect the person who sells-out his country for the "biggest" profit. Your small-time collusion — with the official 9-11 story — for merely cheap Base Exchange beer, paycheck and pension — doesn't inspire me.
Check it out below:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkIckS1WeHo&eu…
1:36 pm on January 23rd, 2007 2
Your claims are absolutely ridiculous. I didn't see anything in your video that shows the building was knocked down with demolitions. My old boss worked in the Pentagon on the Army side that was hit. He fortunately survived the attack. He saw plane wreckage in the Pentagon. How the hell you shoot the Pentagon with a missile and then have somebody run into the Pentagon and throw around airplane wreckage is beyond me. I guess he is part of this great big conspiracy as well.
8:50 pm on January 23rd, 2007 3
Wow. Just wow. Sadly, we cannot prove a non-existence.
If only those dirty Jews could have proven they didn't eat babies….
9:14 pm on January 23rd, 2007 4
And the people said, "Please, I want to doubt!" But, alas…
For those interested in disproving conspiracy theories (who have a LOT of time on their hands) each and every time you go to the ORIGINAL source (very important) of the quote it is proven to be out of context. Try it, it's amazing how disingenuous it all is….backed by people like those above who insist that "want to doubt!" but these timelines and out of context statements somehow convince them whereas the deluge of evidence to the contrary cannot.
The water chemist with a bachelors' degree draws some statement from his backside that contradicts the most preeminent metallerical authorities in the world, and it is believed to the wringing of hands of believers (oh! if only we knew who to believe…the 50 metallurical doctorial specialists or the sanitary engineer who read an article in the paper? I want to believe those engineeers, but the one guy presents such a strong case!)
A janitor becomes an internationally respected witness because he "heard things" in the boiler room and his testimony undermines that of all other witnesses, to include firemen at the scene. Apparently, he his expert ear could determine whether an explosion was backdraft, or secondary, or detonation. He'll never scrub toilets again.
Oh, my! Yes! You want to believe but the overwhelming evidence doesn't permit it…except for relies on completely ignoring 99.99 percent of the rest of the information out there (but the government planted all of that).
8:42 am on January 24th, 2007 5
GI,
Liz, I agree with you: it's folly to easily jump to a conclusion based on hearsay from amatuer testimony, confused witnesses, and an OLD BOSS FROM THE PENTAGON who saw airplane wreckage.
The fact is, there was airplane wreckage found in the Pentagon after the explosion. I agree with you in that it's "ridiculous" to JUMP TO SIMPLE CONCLUSIONS that such wreckage validates the "Official 9-11 story".
We must, however, NOT run away like a silly girl — such as our GI Korea — from hard core facts leading to an inescapable inference. Instead of throwing up rabbit trails, both you and GI must confront the fact that the WTC building 7 demolition (confessed by Larry Silverstein) was executed only a few hours after the twin tower collapse. It creates an ominous inference that you and GI have skirted. A VERY curious avoidance that speaks alot. Maybe I am wrong … maybe GI Korea is NOT a compromised whore colluding with the "official 9-11 story" for a pension … maybe he is a very aware criminal.
GI, please, tell me it aint so!
6:56 pm on January 24th, 2007 6
Here is a link to the very statement that you believe is a confession that explosions were used at the WTC:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-77505323… center 7&pl=true
The fire took down the first two towers, the third one was on fire and Silverstein said to pull it (IOW..let it go) because so many lives were risked for the first two. Curious that the insurance companies who had to pay out aren't using this excuse. Hey! If Silverstein set the explosives that would save them two billion dollars. Guess they are willing to shell out billions to cover up Silverstein's government coverup. Or whatever.
6:59 pm on January 24th, 2007 7
And BTW…whether you feel it's "skirting" your ominous inferences or otherwise, i only have so much time in the day and will not continue answering further. Guess I'm just "afraid of the truth". And SPAM.
10:13 pm on January 24th, 2007 8
Liz, nice link, I figured Silly Sally was twisting somebodies words to fit the 9-11 conspiracy myth. I see nothing in his words that would lead anyone to believe he ordered a demolition team to blow up the building. What he did was misspoke by saying "pull it" instead of "pull out" but the context of his statement was very clear that he wanted the firefighters out of the building before it collapsed and killed more people.
11:31 pm on January 24th, 2007 9
All of the assertions like this are the same. When they are actually tracked down and investigated, you'll find (if you have a LOT of time on your hands) that they are statements taken out of context.
And I was wrong in part of my post above. The insurance payoff was over five billion. Amazing that the companies didn't contest with this "admission of explosives" and all. Of course, we'd be in a real pickle if the terrorists had actually used explosives instead of planes, wouldn't we? Since thousands have swallowed the explosive theory and believed what they were synchronized somehow to go off after the airplanes hit it makes one wonder what they would have come up with had there been no planes. Foregone conclusion I suppose…it was the CIA!
Amazing what people are willing to believe…like the CIA supernotes topic here. It's a whole industry. Never ever, underestimate the depth of stupidity the masses are capable of…the people who spread these rumors certainly don't.
10:37 am on January 25th, 2007 10
Dear Liz, knowing you are a busy girl, I'd like to say thanks for your imput. Yes, the conspiracy IS too monstrous to conceive.
GI, once again the "Ominous Inference" is mentally skipped over like a flat stone thrown skittering across a placid lake. Third party readers of this thread have the perfect chance to behold the infamous "cognitive distortion" of the military groupthink by your willful blindspot. This is a natural phenomina regarding pension whores. I want to believe that, since mentally skipping over the "ominous inference" for other reasons is a higher criminality of mind.
Here is my last swan song, so focus GI. Put on the thinking cap, and take er easy — concentrate.
Silverstein said he received a phone call from the New York Fire department and mutually agreed that the "smartest thing" thing to do … was to … pull — "it". "It" meaning the building, not pull-out the fire men. "Pull" is demolition jargon for blowing up a building in a way it implodes dropping on top itself. Despite the fact building 7 housed the offices of government agencies like the CIA, the FBI, and the SEC (along with the records about the Enron scandal), including the City of New York's emergency command bunker,the mighty authority of the Fire Department gave Silverstein the go-ahead to "pull it"… destroying valuable government records, and equipment. Steel-girded buildings don't collapse onto its feet from spot fires … never have in history. What was the rush?
NOW FOCUS, GI — don't get mentally skittish …Zero in on this point: Demolitions take weeks, if not months of preparation. How did they rig up and explode the building in a few hours?
One might surmise the building was pre-rigged. Why?
Instead of your No Gun Ri apologetic, I think your best contribution to society is to become an apologist for the "Mainstream version of 9-11".
The best source for objective analysis on both sides of the debate is the Wickipedia subject "9-11 Conspiracy theories". Everything has been put together to save you valuable time.
If you can persuade us dazed and confused Americans as to which version is the most plausible … you will restore much needed confidence in our current government. A worthy task… don't you think?
I think you are up to it … you seem smart enough.
11:30 am on January 25th, 2007 11
For third-party readers the hard-core facts are presented objectively here in a very short and sweet format:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9b4D-aO3zY&NR
GI, its required viewing for you too. Don't worry its short enough for your attention-deficit disorder.
1:04 pm on January 25th, 2007 12
Silly Sally, many unprecedented things happened on 9-11. We spoke with several demolition teams that reached the building 7 site by 3:00 pm on 9/11, these individuals witnessed the collapse within a few yards of the building;they saw nothing that indicated a controlled demolition, the building was extensively damaged by falling debris and fire. They heard nothing of the signature explosions of demolition. They knew from the conditions,the building was going to collapse on its own. A more likely cause for the collapse was a large deisal storage tank exploding underneath bringing the building down. It did not go down as a controlled demolition. You need to investigate the facts before spouting off. President Bush in the August 2006 speech, declared that terrorism springs from "subcultures of conspiracy and misinformation," and that "terrorists recruit more effectively from populations whose information about the world is contaminated by falsehoods and corrupted by conspiracy theories". The distortions keep alive grievances and filter out facts that would challenge popular prejudices and self-serving propaganda.
I would remind you the Military Commissions Act legally enables ferreting-out of American citizens who contribute to this contamination, subjecting them to the designation of "enemy combatant". May I remind you an "enemy combatant" is subject to covert arrest, pressure, and unlimited confinement without anyone knowing about it. Think about it.
4:05 pm on January 26th, 2007 13
That's the funniest thing I've seen in a long time. Thanks, SS! LOL!
1:32 am on August 15th, 2008 14
[...] North Korean Super Notes Made by the CIA at ROK Drop said, [...]