Serving on the Forgotten Frontier

ROK Drop

December 19th, 2007 at 4:23 am

NATO Requesting Japanese Troops Deploy to Afghanistan

» by GI Korea in: Japan

I find it just a bit ironic that NATO has the nerve to ask non-NATO country Japan to deploy military assets to Afghanistan including combat forces when the vast majority of NATO countries won’t deploy combat forces themselves:

NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer says he hopes Japan will assume a bigger role in the reconstruction of Afghanistan, including possibly taking part in the NATO-led security mission.

Speaking at a forum in Tokyo Thursday, de Hoop Scheffer said Japan has yet to reach, what he called, “the limit of its possibilities” in participating in the operations of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan.

NATO commanders have complained that the current level of troops for ISAF is not enough to ensure security for Afghanistan, where the international force is battling a resurgent Taliban.

The NATO chief is to meet with Japanese Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda later Thursday. He also is due to hold talks with Japan’s defense and foreign ministers during his three-day visit.  [VOA]

Things must be desperate in NATO if the member countries are so cowardly that commanders have to ask a country with a pacifist constitution to deploy troops instead.  The reason for this is because countries like Australia that have been involved in heavy combat and taking casualties want other countries to pull their own weight and are refusing to send any more troops to Afghanistan.  Ironically like Japan, Australia is not part of NATO either.

Since the Europeans won’t send troops they want Japan to send them instead.  The further irony in all this is that the Europeans have just passed a resolution condemning Japan for their World War II past, but they want Japan to help them now.

This is all coming up in the aftermath of US and British troops recapturing the city of Musa Qala after the British had handed the city over to the Taliban with a gentlemen’s agreement that they wouldn’t cause any trouble.  Of course that failed and an offensive had to be launched to recapture the city.  The problem in Afghanistan is that after capturing territory their is not enough soldiers left to secure it and NATO actually expects the Japanese to be part of the solution to this problem.  Personally the US Marines sound like a better alternative to me.

Popularity: 2%

- 75 views
4
  • Knickerbocker
    5:22 am on December 19th, 2007 1

    This will be interesting. As Korea leaves with its tail between its legs, Japan goes in, guns blazing.

  • KoolMoeDee
    7:51 am on December 19th, 2007 2

    No blood for welfare. U.S. out of NATO now!

  • Mark
    9:17 am on December 19th, 2007 3

    Let’s just magic move some US troops from Iraq to Afghanistan.

  • usinkorea
    12:40 pm on December 19th, 2007 4

    It will be interesting to watch France and South Korea over the next year to two years given their presidential elections.

    The S Korean election is probably over by now, but I haven’t seen the results, but I am guessing the conservatives got it.

    France elected a pro-US leader recently.

    Will those two put their resources where they say their hearts are at?

    They could try to prove they are strong leaders + willing to chart new paths by sending significant numbers of troops to Afghanistan and/or Iraq…

 

RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.