<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Japan Advocates for &#8220;Peace Tunnel&#8221; to Korea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/</link>
	<description>Serving on the Forgotten Frontier</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: GI Korea</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132877</link>
		<dc:creator>GI Korea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132877</guid>
		<description>Chickenhead LOL. :lol: 

However, I think a tunnel to Sasebo would be closer than Kadena.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chickenhead LOL. <img src='http://rokdrop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>However, I think a tunnel to Sasebo would be closer than Kadena.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChickenHead</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132800</link>
		<dc:creator>ChickenHead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132800</guid>
		<description>There is probably already a tunnel from a basement coffee shop in Pusan to the alcohol storage area of the Kadina BX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is probably already a tunnel from a basement coffee shop in Pusan to the alcohol storage area of the Kadina BX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GI Korea</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132730</link>
		<dc:creator>GI Korea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132730</guid>
		<description>I think this tunnel would benefit Korea more because they would probably get all the benefits of such a tunnel without having to pay much for it because the Japanese I would presume would fund the majority of the bill.  Plus such a tunnel would probably never be constructed without a Korea-Japan FTA which there has been some discussion about recently.  

However, I would not bet any money on seeing this project ever completed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this tunnel would benefit Korea more because they would probably get all the benefits of such a tunnel without having to pay much for it because the Japanese I would presume would fund the majority of the bill.  Plus such a tunnel would probably never be constructed without a Korea-Japan FTA which there has been some discussion about recently.  </p>
<p>However, I would not bet any money on seeing this project ever completed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baltimoron</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132471</link>
		<dc:creator>Baltimoron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132471</guid>
		<description>http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/feb/15/japan.korea/print

The MPs will first have to persuade Tokyo and Seoul to fund a joint feasibility study. But the notion of connecting the east Asian rivals with a rail link is not as far-fetched as it would have been just a few years ago.

This project is even more pathetic than I thought. This is a honeymoon fantasy, and I hope more realistic thoughts about alliance and DPRK replace it. It's a nice sign, but a waste of taxpayer dollars. De-regulating the airline industry (http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/a-peace-tunnel-instead-of-a-grand-canal/#comment-135414) and opening up SMEs make much more economic sense than these tired bureaucratic stunts. from canal to peace tunnel, I hope the old guard in both countries are just clearing out their deadwood and bad ideas before the real work starts on February 25th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/feb/15/japan.korea/print" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/feb/15/japan.korea/print</a></p>
<p>The MPs will first have to persuade Tokyo and Seoul to fund a joint feasibility study. But the notion of connecting the east Asian rivals with a rail link is not as far-fetched as it would have been just a few years ago.</p>
<p>This project is even more pathetic than I thought. This is a honeymoon fantasy, and I hope more realistic thoughts about alliance and DPRK replace it. It&#8217;s a nice sign, but a waste of taxpayer dollars. De-regulating the airline industry (http://www.rjkoehler.com/2008/02/16/a-peace-tunnel-instead-of-a-grand-canal/#comment-135414) and opening up SMEs make much more economic sense than these tired bureaucratic stunts. from canal to peace tunnel, I hope the old guard in both countries are just clearing out their deadwood and bad ideas before the real work starts on February 25th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baltimoron</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132465</link>
		<dc:creator>Baltimoron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132465</guid>
		<description>Dada: And, you're just a gold star reporter, right? Go find your own joy!

Ironically, this white elephant, if it ever goes anywhere, would probably suck in more migrant workers, because I doubt either Japan or ROK has the blue-collar resources for the it. And, DaDa, that's what this about: employment during a recession from a ROK PM promising 747, and a Japanese PM with low ratings and a non-performing economy. It's nothing serious! Thankfully!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dada: And, you&#8217;re just a gold star reporter, right? Go find your own joy!</p>
<p>Ironically, this white elephant, if it ever goes anywhere, would probably suck in more migrant workers, because I doubt either Japan or ROK has the blue-collar resources for the it. And, DaDa, that&#8217;s what this about: employment during a recession from a ROK PM promising 747, and a Japanese PM with low ratings and a non-performing economy. It&#8217;s nothing serious! Thankfully!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dada</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132457</link>
		<dc:creator>Dada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132457</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... I am interested in how this will end up and was hoping to read some decent feedbacks here... but I see nothing but lame/sarcastic remarks. I wonder why GI Korea thinks the build will benefit Korea more, considering that vast majority of Koreans oppose this idea under the judgement that the project will benefit Japan the most. One thing for sure, Japan exports a lot more products to Korea than the other way around. Japan maybe abe to benefit from efficient transportion (cost effective) of goods to Korea and othe parts of Asia, or so some people suggest. I do not knw the details of whyJapanese suddenly wants this... but yes the remarks here are just plain sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; I am interested in how this will end up and was hoping to read some decent feedbacks here&#8230; but I see nothing but lame/sarcastic remarks. I wonder why GI Korea thinks the build will benefit Korea more, considering that vast majority of Koreans oppose this idea under the judgement that the project will benefit Japan the most. One thing for sure, Japan exports a lot more products to Korea than the other way around. Japan maybe abe to benefit from efficient transportion (cost effective) of goods to Korea and othe parts of Asia, or so some people suggest. I do not knw the details of whyJapanese suddenly wants this&#8230; but yes the remarks here are just plain sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Build it and they will come</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132103</link>
		<dc:creator>Build it and they will come</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132103</guid>
		<description>I don't think SK could ever build the tunnel fast enough to keep the water from caving in on them.  Their engineers have been working on this for quite some time and have found the only way it can be done is when the water freezes.  But, when the water melts, it always fills the tunnel back in.  No doubt they'll eventually figure it out.  (They first have to make the leap from building their national monuments out of wood - the three little pigs story has a lot of meaning)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think SK could ever build the tunnel fast enough to keep the water from caving in on them.  Their engineers have been working on this for quite some time and have found the only way it can be done is when the water freezes.  But, when the water melts, it always fills the tunnel back in.  No doubt they&#8217;ll eventually figure it out.  (They first have to make the leap from building their national monuments out of wood - the three little pigs story has a lot of meaning)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Build it and they will come</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132102</link>
		<dc:creator>Build it and they will come</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132102</guid>
		<description>What about the plans for Korea to build a bridge to the moon or tunnel to the US - oh, they already did that one.  Personally, I have no doubt Korea could tunnel to Japan even if they started digging today.  What I can't imagine is if they were to add a roadway and let cab drivers compete with the KTX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the plans for Korea to build a bridge to the moon or tunnel to the US - oh, they already did that one.  Personally, I have no doubt Korea could tunnel to Japan even if they started digging today.  What I can&#8217;t imagine is if they were to add a roadway and let cab drivers compete with the KTX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skippy-san</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132039</link>
		<dc:creator>Skippy-san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-132039</guid>
		<description>I saw a special on National Georgraphic that speculated on building a tunnel across the Atlantic. The tunnel was not dug into the ground but suspended in the water at a depth of about 200 feet. Lots of technical challenges to be sure-but little digging involved-just suspending tunnel.

This will never happen though-politically its not feasible for either country-plus it seems to me JAL, Asiana, ANA, and KAL would do their damndest to kill it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a special on National Georgraphic that speculated on building a tunnel across the Atlantic. The tunnel was not dug into the ground but suspended in the water at a depth of about 200 feet. Lots of technical challenges to be sure-but little digging involved-just suspending tunnel.</p>
<p>This will never happen though-politically its not feasible for either country-plus it seems to me JAL, Asiana, ANA, and KAL would do their damndest to kill it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knickerbocker</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-131962</link>
		<dc:creator>knickerbocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/02/18/japan-advocates-for-peace-tunnel-to-korea/#comment-131962</guid>
		<description>Didn't North Korea build its own "Peace Tunnels" into South Korea back in the 1970s?  :grin:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t North Korea build its own &#8220;Peace Tunnels&#8221; into South Korea back in the 1970s?  <img src='http://rokdrop.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
