<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study Recommends Repealing &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/</link>
	<description>Serving on the Forgotten Frontier</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chickenhead</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-178043</link>
		<dc:creator>Chickenhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 15:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-178043</guid>
		<description>Sounds like USFK should model itself on the Sacred Band of Thebes.

It would solve that whole juicy girl problem, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like USFK should model itself on the Sacred Band of Thebes.</p>
<p>It would solve that whole juicy girl problem, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shattered</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-178005</link>
		<dc:creator>shattered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-178005</guid>
		<description>"There are so many males that I have known who feel they must tell me thier penis size. Usually the ones who have a small one and feel the need to express it."

You are a fruit cake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are so many males that I have known who feel they must tell me thier penis size. Usually the ones who have a small one and feel the need to express it.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are a fruit cake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaetano Calabresi</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177998</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaetano Calabresi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177998</guid>
		<description>Goodness gracious, GI! I guess reading comprehension wasn't one of your fortes when you took the ASVAB.

I've made it pretty clear that the current policy concerning gays in the military wasn't created and enacted solely by Congress, as you absurdly note. Anybody who goes through the primary and secondary accounts of the history of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell", knows that Pentagon officials played a large hand in crafting the policy that we have today.

The current policy is something that the military brass was willing to accept in 1993 and Congress abetted their willingness.

So, the notion that all one has to do is go and petition their elected representative to have the policy changed is pat at best. Such a notion totally ignores the powerful institutional pressure, outside the Congress, that keeps the status quo in place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodness gracious, GI! I guess reading comprehension wasn&#8217;t one of your fortes when you took the ASVAB.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve made it pretty clear that the current policy concerning gays in the military wasn&#8217;t created and enacted solely by Congress, as you absurdly note. Anybody who goes through the primary and secondary accounts of the history of &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221;, knows that Pentagon officials played a large hand in crafting the policy that we have today.</p>
<p>The current policy is something that the military brass was willing to accept in 1993 and Congress abetted their willingness.</p>
<p>So, the notion that all one has to do is go and petition their elected representative to have the policy changed is pat at best. Such a notion totally ignores the powerful institutional pressure, outside the Congress, that keeps the status quo in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GI Korea</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177979</link>
		<dc:creator>GI Korea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 09:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177979</guid>
		<description>It is interesting that Gaetano goes out of his way to make his argument just come back to the conclusion I made before:


&lt;blockquote&gt;
“…the military didn’t make the policy, Congress did. The military just implements the policy Congress legislates.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;



Bottom line is that it is a Congressional policy that if people want to change it they need to call their Congressmen not the Joint Chiefs of Staff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that Gaetano goes out of his way to make his argument just come back to the conclusion I made before:</p>
<blockquote><p>
“…the military didn’t make the policy, Congress did. The military just implements the policy Congress legislates.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Bottom line is that it is a Congressional policy that if people want to change it they need to call their Congressmen not the Joint Chiefs of Staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaetano Calabresi</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177908</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaetano Calabresi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177908</guid>
		<description>If you want to assert that I'm equally engaged in revisionism, DMZDave, I won't take that away from you. However, I do ask that you provide some sort of concrete evidence that indicates so, rather than trying to pass off your own personal experience as proof of your assertion. 

I'm well aware of the personal positions of high level civilian officials at the time, as well as the sort political stunts engaged in by some activist groups. I'm also aware, as you stated, that many American voters had strong opposition to fully integrating homosexuals into the military and that they strongly voiced those concerns to their representatives. 

However, all those things do not take away from the main point that I was making to GI: that the current "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy IS NOT something that was solely created by representatives and senators in the United States Congress. The impression that GI gives, is that high level Pentagon officials had no say in the current policy. In GI's formulation, the military was merely "following orders".

It is this argument that most know to be utterly false. You didn't have to have been in the Pentagon's working group in 1993 to know that fact.

In his book, "War in a Time of Peace", the late journalist David Halberstam writes this about Powell and the issue of gays in the military:

"Powell himself was very conservative on this issue, and friends remember him becoming quite irate when the argument was made that integrating gays into the military was a step not unlike integrating blacks some 45 years earlier. It was by no means the same, he said quite vehemently. Powell was also speaking for many of his colleagues who were decidedly unenthusiastic about the idea. Opposition on the part of the Joint Chiefs and within the entire military cadre would be very, very strong, he said, because it touched on issue of human sexuality, opening up questions far more divisive than those raised by racial integration. POWELL ADVOCATED A "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" POLICY, which would not satisfy everyone-indeed, it would probably not satisfy anyone on either side-but it would almost surely work. The military, he(Powell) believed, with its inherent codes of justice and fairness, would do the rest."

(This quote is taken from page 205 of the paper edition of "War in a Time of Peace)

There you have it: GI's Congress, ALONG with its conservative allies in the military forced on President Clinton and then pushed through the current policy.

To be honest DMZDave, I think that you give me way too much credit when you say that I'm engaging in "revisionism". When the fact of the matter is, I'm engaging in something far more mundane: stating a mere, obvious fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to assert that I&#8217;m equally engaged in revisionism, DMZDave, I won&#8217;t take that away from you. However, I do ask that you provide some sort of concrete evidence that indicates so, rather than trying to pass off your own personal experience as proof of your assertion. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m well aware of the personal positions of high level civilian officials at the time, as well as the sort political stunts engaged in by some activist groups. I&#8217;m also aware, as you stated, that many American voters had strong opposition to fully integrating homosexuals into the military and that they strongly voiced those concerns to their representatives. </p>
<p>However, all those things do not take away from the main point that I was making to GI: that the current &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221; policy IS NOT something that was solely created by representatives and senators in the United States Congress. The impression that GI gives, is that high level Pentagon officials had no say in the current policy. In GI&#8217;s formulation, the military was merely &#8220;following orders&#8221;.</p>
<p>It is this argument that most know to be utterly false. You didn&#8217;t have to have been in the Pentagon&#8217;s working group in 1993 to know that fact.</p>
<p>In his book, &#8220;War in a Time of Peace&#8221;, the late journalist David Halberstam writes this about Powell and the issue of gays in the military:</p>
<p>&#8220;Powell himself was very conservative on this issue, and friends remember him becoming quite irate when the argument was made that integrating gays into the military was a step not unlike integrating blacks some 45 years earlier. It was by no means the same, he said quite vehemently. Powell was also speaking for many of his colleagues who were decidedly unenthusiastic about the idea. Opposition on the part of the Joint Chiefs and within the entire military cadre would be very, very strong, he said, because it touched on issue of human sexuality, opening up questions far more divisive than those raised by racial integration. POWELL ADVOCATED A &#8220;DON&#8217;T ASK, DON&#8217;T TELL&#8221; POLICY, which would not satisfy everyone-indeed, it would probably not satisfy anyone on either side-but it would almost surely work. The military, he(Powell) believed, with its inherent codes of justice and fairness, would do the rest.&#8221;</p>
<p>(This quote is taken from page 205 of the paper edition of &#8220;War in a Time of Peace)</p>
<p>There you have it: GI&#8217;s Congress, ALONG with its conservative allies in the military forced on President Clinton and then pushed through the current policy.</p>
<p>To be honest DMZDave, I think that you give me way too much credit when you say that I&#8217;m engaging in &#8220;revisionism&#8221;. When the fact of the matter is, I&#8217;m engaging in something far more mundane: stating a mere, obvious fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMZDave</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177636</link>
		<dc:creator>DMZDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177636</guid>
		<description>Gaetano is also engaging in some historic revisionism.  I was in the Pentagon when Clinton came into office and I participated in the early Army working groups at the Pentagon that met to work out the integration of gays in the military. The military didn't like the whole gays in the military issue and weren't happy with Clinton but most of the senior leadership in the Pentagon saluted and began to prepare for the policy to change.

Senator Nunn among others heard loud and clear from their constituents that they wanted the Congress to oppose.  The radical gay rights group Act Up staged a "kiss in" protest in Nunn's front office and it did not have its intended affect.  He was disgusted ss were a large number of staff on the Hill and Act Up definitely helped kill the Clinton initiative.  The White House also was rocked by the reaction from the publicand Clinton was in swift retreat.  Powell, Aspin and Nunn provided him a reasonable opportunity based on the new policy to retreat.  Clinton grabbed it and ran with it and probably smacked Stephanopoulos about the head and shoulders for getting him into that one in the first place.

I agree with GI in terms of the way the Army generally deals with gays.  My policy for gay and heterosexual misbehavior was always, don't put it in my face and make me deal with it.  The only gays I tossed were those who didn't keep their hands to home and molested other soldiers.  And of course there was the time I was walking through my motorpool in Graf and I found two soldiers going at it in the back of a Gamma Goat (yeah I'm an old guy). No matter what, for some reason that Goat's bumper number was always being repainted HHB-69 by some clever jokester.  

Today, so many gay soldiers are being discharged because they are stepping forward and saying "Iraq sucks and so do I."  You sign up today for 4 years, you're going to do 8 after you are recalled from the IRR.  Just say you are gay and you're out. Obviously a lot of young men and women are stepping forward to "tell."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaetano is also engaging in some historic revisionism.  I was in the Pentagon when Clinton came into office and I participated in the early Army working groups at the Pentagon that met to work out the integration of gays in the military. The military didn&#8217;t like the whole gays in the military issue and weren&#8217;t happy with Clinton but most of the senior leadership in the Pentagon saluted and began to prepare for the policy to change.</p>
<p>Senator Nunn among others heard loud and clear from their constituents that they wanted the Congress to oppose.  The radical gay rights group Act Up staged a &#8220;kiss in&#8221; protest in Nunn&#8217;s front office and it did not have its intended affect.  He was disgusted ss were a large number of staff on the Hill and Act Up definitely helped kill the Clinton initiative.  The White House also was rocked by the reaction from the publicand Clinton was in swift retreat.  Powell, Aspin and Nunn provided him a reasonable opportunity based on the new policy to retreat.  Clinton grabbed it and ran with it and probably smacked Stephanopoulos about the head and shoulders for getting him into that one in the first place.</p>
<p>I agree with GI in terms of the way the Army generally deals with gays.  My policy for gay and heterosexual misbehavior was always, don&#8217;t put it in my face and make me deal with it.  The only gays I tossed were those who didn&#8217;t keep their hands to home and molested other soldiers.  And of course there was the time I was walking through my motorpool in Graf and I found two soldiers going at it in the back of a Gamma Goat (yeah I&#8217;m an old guy). No matter what, for some reason that Goat&#8217;s bumper number was always being repainted HHB-69 by some clever jokester.  </p>
<p>Today, so many gay soldiers are being discharged because they are stepping forward and saying &#8220;Iraq sucks and so do I.&#8221;  You sign up today for 4 years, you&#8217;re going to do 8 after you are recalled from the IRR.  Just say you are gay and you&#8217;re out. Obviously a lot of young men and women are stepping forward to &#8220;tell.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chickenhead</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177633</link>
		<dc:creator>Chickenhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 02:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177633</guid>
		<description>The biggest concern is that lonely, bored, horney GIs who are not gay will get sucked into it...

...so to speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest concern is that lonely, bored, horney GIs who are not gay will get sucked into it&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;so to speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177618</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177618</guid>
		<description>I liked the "don't ask, don't tell policy". Both in the military and after I retired. I really don't want to know what anyones sexual preferences are and in the work place I don't care. There are so many males that I have known who feel they must tell me thier penis size. Usually the ones who have a small one and feel the need to express it. I really, really, don't care and don't want to know. So now the boss has to deal with "Hi sarge, I'm gay you know." Give everyone a break and tell them to keep thier sexual preferences out of military life and my life as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the &#8220;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell policy&#8221;. Both in the military and after I retired. I really don&#8217;t want to know what anyones sexual preferences are and in the work place I don&#8217;t care. There are so many males that I have known who feel they must tell me thier penis size. Usually the ones who have a small one and feel the need to express it. I really, really, don&#8217;t care and don&#8217;t want to know. So now the boss has to deal with &#8220;Hi sarge, I&#8217;m gay you know.&#8221; Give everyone a break and tell them to keep thier sexual preferences out of military life and my life as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaetano Calabresi</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177605</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaetano Calabresi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177605</guid>
		<description>"...the military didn't make the policy, Congress did. The military just implements the policy Congress legislates."

I'm sorry GI, but this is either a highly bowlderized interpretation of actual events or a fumbling attempt at historical revision.

Yes, GI, you're right in that it was Congress who debated and eventually pushed through the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. But yet again, your engaging in a semantically shallow analysis. 

Any sensible and serious telling of the history of the current "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy must contend with three indviduals: Senator Sam Nunn, who in 1993 chaired the Senate Armed Services Committee; Charles Moskos, the military sociologist who laid the intellectual foundations of the policy; and obviously Colin Powell, then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

It was these three individuals that gave serious energy in pushing through "Don't Ask, Don't Tell". Did Congress play it's substantial role? Of course. But so did very powerful and influential individuals such as Colin Powell. Moreover, it was due to vehement protests, in part by the Pentagon brass, on comments made by then President Bill Clinton, the resulted in the policy we have today. 

So the notion that the military itself had no role whatsoever in crafting "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" is clearly and demonstrably false. They were one of the intials groups that ignited the controversy, and along with their allies in Congress, successfully manuevered in passing the policy into law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the military didn&#8217;t make the policy, Congress did. The military just implements the policy Congress legislates.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry GI, but this is either a highly bowlderized interpretation of actual events or a fumbling attempt at historical revision.</p>
<p>Yes, GI, you&#8217;re right in that it was Congress who debated and eventually pushed through the &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221; policy. But yet again, your engaging in a semantically shallow analysis. </p>
<p>Any sensible and serious telling of the history of the current &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221; policy must contend with three indviduals: Senator Sam Nunn, who in 1993 chaired the Senate Armed Services Committee; Charles Moskos, the military sociologist who laid the intellectual foundations of the policy; and obviously Colin Powell, then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.</p>
<p>It was these three individuals that gave serious energy in pushing through &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221;. Did Congress play it&#8217;s substantial role? Of course. But so did very powerful and influential individuals such as Colin Powell. Moreover, it was due to vehement protests, in part by the Pentagon brass, on comments made by then President Bill Clinton, the resulted in the policy we have today. </p>
<p>So the notion that the military itself had no role whatsoever in crafting &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221; is clearly and demonstrably false. They were one of the intials groups that ignited the controversy, and along with their allies in Congress, successfully manuevered in passing the policy into law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kingkitty</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177601</link>
		<dc:creator>Kingkitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/2008/07/11/study-recommends-repealing-dont-ask-dont-tell/#comment-177601</guid>
		<description>So what if your gay and don't meet the weight requirements but you score 300 on your pt tests?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what if your gay and don&#8217;t meet the weight requirements but you score 300 on your pt tests?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
