It is always great to give soldiers their own room if reasonable:
When soldiers shared barracks rooms in South Korea in the 1950s and ’60s, they didn’t have 300 pounds of gear apiece and a 42-inch plasma television to cram into their quarters.
Today’s Army standard is a 160-square-foot room for each soldier, said officials at U.S. Army Garrison-Red Cloud, a collection of bases from north of Seoul to the Demilitarized Zone.
Some of the buildings within the garrison, also known as Area I, were built in the ’50s and ’60s to a smaller standard. Junior enlisted soldiers are sharing those rooms in some cases.
Giving those soldiers their own spaces would improve the soldier readiness and quality of life, a panel of soldiers at the Army Family Action Plan Conference said Wednesday.
Although commanders for the most part stayed out of the panel discussions so the soldiers could speak freely, Camp Casey’s enclave commander told Stars and Stripes on Wednesday that private rooms have been considered. (….)
Barracks occupancy could fall as soldiers at camps Jackson, Red Cloud and Stanley take advantage of a recent policy change allowing them to gain command sponsorship and live off-post.
The garrison can’t build new barracks because it is considered “nonenduring” under the U.S. Forces Korea relocation plan, which has been delayed several times.
Area I is renovating its older barracks and adding new furnishings but is limited by its quantity of temporary housing, Meisler said. [Stars & Stripes]
Here is solution I don’t find to be reasonable:
“I think Korea is uniquely equipped to have geographically spaced units,” said 1st Lt. Joyce Jordan of 1st Brigade’s headquarters company.
Jordan cited as examples the 55th and 94th Military Police, which have platoons spread out at various bases.
Camp Red Cloud in Uijeongbu, where about 1,000 soldiers are stationed, is relatively cramped. About 20 minutes across town, Camp Stanley has barracks buildings sitting vacant.
The MP units are a special case because their platoons provide the MP support to their respective bases. These other units would have platoons living on another base and have to transport all the soldiers to work every morning and then get them back after work every day. Is 2ID going to hire special buses to do this? Is there money to do this? Also monitoring the barracks by the unit CQ and leadership becomes more difficult if soldiers are living on multiple bases which ultimately will probably lead to more barracks incidents. These are just some of the questions that immediately come to mind but I can’t imagine too many commanders or First Sergeants will support having their unit spread out on multiple bases.






10:31 am on November 21st, 2008 1
MP support? What the heck does that mean? I've not seen an MP protecting the base, just a bunch of civilian contractors who potentially compromise security on the bases when a Korean bluffs their way on base. Look at Osan Air Base which has American Service Members on the gates. Theft and black marketing along with organized crime are almost non-existent compared with USAG-Y. I'm for giving the single Soldier a mansion to live in, but don't try to tell me the MPs provide "MP support" that means nothing to me here.
11:41 am on November 21st, 2008 2
The move to Humphreys isn't going to happen for years, if ever. They need to suck it up and toss a few more buildings up.
I hope it never goes through, personally. Who wants to live in Pyeongtaek?
12:53 pm on November 21st, 2008 3
Theft and black marketing along with organized crime are almost non-existent compared with USAG-Y.
1:28 pm on November 21st, 2008 4
@1 What does having MPs on the gates have to do with cracking down on black marketing and organized crime?
As for allowing random Koreans on base I suggest you take that up with the Good Neighbor Program and it's supporters.
10:22 am on November 22nd, 2008 5
If you go to Camp Stanley for example the MPs there run the MP station not private security. So when a soldier gets arrested in the ville he gets arrested by MPs not private security. Comment left via Kindle.
11:35 pm on November 22nd, 2008 6
I think the assets on Osan AB may be a higher priority than even Yongsan with the 4 button and that is why they use SPs for security. However, they seem more occupied with what is comming onto the base than with what is leaving.
12:29 am on November 23rd, 2008 7
When I was a private in 2ID, my bunk was in an open bay in a quonset hut. I didn't think of it as sub-standard, because at the time that was how all privates lived.
Although I'm sure having your own room is nice, there was a certain camaraderie and team unity that resulted from everyone living in the same room. I don't think you can have that with everyone living in separate rooms.