I would love to see a complete translation of this document to see what context it was written in:

A Japanese government document dating from 1951 shows that Japan excluded Dokdo from its territory ? apparently negating on Japan’s claim that it has long-recognized the islets as Japanese.

The Korea Maritime Institute said Saturday that it discovered a Japanese document that excluded the islets from Japan’s maritime territory when it rearranged property acquired during its colonization of nearby countries.

“Prime Ministerial Ordinance No. 24,” issued on June 6, 1951, stated that Japanese territory was Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku and nearby islands and excluded Jeju Island, Ulleung Island and Dokdo.

Some old Japanese maps and books had previously omitted Dokdo from its territory, but it was the first time a government ordinance did, according to the institute.

“The ordinance shows that Japan did not have the authority to exercise property rights over Dokdo because it recognized that the islets did not belong to it ? meaning they belonged to Korea, known then as “Joseon,” Yoo Mi-rim, a senior researcher of the the Korea Maritime Institute’s Korea Dokdo Research Center, said.

Japan has claimed that it acknowledged Dokdo as its territory long ago, but the document shows that it did not, at least before the San Francisco Peace Treaty was concluded on Sept. 8, 1951, Yoo said.

The agreement, which took effect in April 1952, officially renounced Japan’s rights to Korea and other Asian regions it colonized after World War II. The treaty was the beginning of an over 50-years of dispute between Korea and Japan over Dokdo because the document did not explicitly state Dokdo’s legal status.

“According to the document, Japan recognized Korea’s sovereignty over Ulleung Island and Dokdo until just before the treaty was made. It is also significant that the Japanese government acknowledged so in its own ordinance,” Yoo said.

The ordinance was among several documents sent in July from the Japanese foreign ministry to Korean lawyer, Choi Bong-tae, who won a suit to demand that the ministry disclose the documents covering Korea-Japan talks. The section relating to ordinance No. 24 was removed from the documents when Choi received them, but the maritime institute later discovered it, Yoo said. [Korea Times]

Why I would like to see a complete translation is because did the document specificially say Dokdo was not included in Japanese territory?  Or did it just specifically say Cheju and Ulleongdo were not Japanese territory but said nothing about the status of Dokdo?  If nothing is specifically said about Dokdo in the document then this document is pretty much worthless because the Japanese can just say Dokdo was not mentioned because it is Japanese territory.

Now if the document specificically says Dokdo is Korean territory then this is a significant find.  I just don’t trust Korean media reporting on the issue to be the final word on this.  Has anyone else seen a translated version of this document?