<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Uncovered Japanese Document Claims Dokdo is Korean Territory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rokdrop.com/2009/01/04/uncovered-japanese-document-claims-dokdo-korean-territory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rokdrop.com/2009/01/04/uncovered-japanese-document-claims-dokdo-korean-territory/</link>
	<description>Korea From North to South</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:07:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Stewart San Ant</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2009/01/04/uncovered-japanese-document-claims-dokdo-korean-territory/comment-page-1/#comment-270080</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Stewart San Ant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/?p=10585#comment-270080</guid>
		<description>Well, if the item in question doesn&#039;t include the Ryukyu archipelago (Okinawa) in its list, it&#039;s probably yet another piece of fraudulent crap in the long list of fraudulent crap used to support one side&#039;s claim over the other&#039;s.  There&#039;s no way an &quot;official&quot; Japanese government document doesn&#039;t claim the Ryukyu since they were considered part of Japan since the Tokugawa shogunate. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if the item in question doesn&#039;t include the Ryukyu archipelago (Okinawa) in its list, it&#039;s probably yet another piece of fraudulent crap in the long list of fraudulent crap used to support one side&#039;s claim over the other&#039;s.  There&#039;s no way an &quot;official&quot; Japanese government document doesn&#039;t claim the Ryukyu since they were considered part of Japan since the Tokugawa shogunate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GI Korea</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2009/01/04/uncovered-japanese-document-claims-dokdo-korean-territory/comment-page-1/#comment-269938</link>
		<dc:creator>GI Korea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/?p=10585#comment-269938</guid>
		<description>That is if Dokdo is mentioned clearly in the document.  If Dokdo is clearly mentioned in the document as not being Japanese territory then the Koreans have greatly strengthened their case. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is if Dokdo is mentioned clearly in the document.  If Dokdo is clearly mentioned in the document as not being Japanese territory then the Koreans have greatly strengthened their case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2009/01/04/uncovered-japanese-document-claims-dokdo-korean-territory/comment-page-1/#comment-269903</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 06:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/?p=10585#comment-269903</guid>
		<description>Based on the information presented in the post I would have to say that Dokdo does not belong to Japan. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the information presented in the post I would have to say that Dokdo does not belong to Japan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

