ROK Drop

By on January 19th, 2009 at 10:17 am

North Korea Threatens Military Action Against the South; Discloses Nuclear Weapons

I hope no one is getting to worked up by the latest North Korean threats:

The North Korean Army on Saturday threatened military action against the South, saying President Lee Myung-bak and his “puppet military warhawks” would force North Korean forces “to take a strong military retaliatory step to wipe them out.” The occasion was an accusation by the North that the South Korean Navy is sending warships into North Korean waters.

The statement came on the eve of U.S. president-elect Barack Obama’s inauguration, and the North has traditionally taken the opportunity of any transition in the U.S. to rattle the saber.  [Chosun Ilbo]

South Korea in response has added additional soldiers along the Demilitarized Zone between the two countries:

South Korea placed more soldiers at frontier guard posts and told its fishermen to refrain from sailing near North Korean waters on Sunday, a day after the North Korean military declared an “all-out confrontational posture” against the South and threatened a naval clash.  [New York Times]

Joe Biden was finally right about something, President Obama would be tested shortly after taking office, which doesn’t take a genius to figure out.  This is all pretty much rhetoric anyway, here is the real news coming out of North Korea:

The North Korean threat on Saturday came in the same day when an American scholar said North Korean officials told him that they had “weaponized” enough plutonium for roughly four or five nuclear bombs. Also Saturday, North Korea’s Foreign Ministry said the country would maintain its “status as a nuclear weapons state” as long as it perceived a nuclear threat from the United States.American intelligence officials have previously estimated that the North had harvested enough fuel for six or more bombs, although it has never been clear whether the North constructed the weapons. The scholar, Selig S. Harrison, said the officials had not defined what “weaponized” meant, but the implication was that they had built nuclear arms.  [New York Times]

If you don’t know who Selig Harrison is, he is just another North Korean apologist in the mold of Bruce Cumings and Kim Jong-Bill Richardson who the North Koreans have used before as a go between.  As One Free Korea rightfully points out other North Korea apologists like David Albright are suddenly quiet about North Korea’s uranium program:

One thing we do seem to have learned is that North Korea had a secret uranium enrichment program after all. That’s a pretty big concession when you consider that denying either the fact or the significance of North Korea’s uranium cheat is essential to any defense of Agreed Framework I, and hence of President Clinton’s North Korea policy. Some A.F. 1.0 defenders had tried to minimize the HEU cheat as insignificant, while others suggested that it was all just a trumped up necon causus belli. So what was it that shut all these people up? Was it the enriched uranium we found on those aluminum samples the North Koreans gave us, or was it the enriched uranium we found smeared all over their “disclosure” documents? Was it the damning admissions of A.Q. Khan and Benazir Bhutto? Or was it North Korea’s brazen 2002 admission, which some had feebly tried to ascribe to a translation error? Maybe North Korea’s 2007 admission that it procured centrifuge components, perhaps? All I know is that David Albright has been strangely quiet recently, and that Mike Chinoy’s book — now there is some really bad timing — was forgotten the week after it was rolled out. After all of the noise, the eerie unanimity of North Korea’s cheating includes William Perry, Condi Rice, and now, Hillary Clinton.

So what is next in the tensions between North & South Korea?  I think One Free Korea has analyzed this correctly, watch the NLL.

Tags: ,
- 864 views
7
  • gerry
    12:21 pm on January 19th, 2009 1

    My first thought of weaponized plutonium is of artillory shells. Probobly not difficult to make and could be employed within firing distance of Seoul. Tremendous psychological effect if used.

  • In Seoul
    7:58 pm on January 19th, 2009 2

    My thought is that Kim Jong-Il never had any intention of giving up all his nukes and never will—as long as there is breath in his lungs. My guess is that he views Mr. Obama as a weak political opportunist whom he can manipulate on the chubby, little finger of his hand. He expects to have his nukes and caress them too. :grin:

  • GI Korea
    12:32 am on January 20th, 2009 3

    Gerry for the most part nuclear weapons doesn't change much on the peninsula because the North Koreans can just as easily kill people with their chemical and biological weapons. The nuclear weapons are for international purposes especially if they weaponize them to put on the their missiles.

    In Seoul is right that the North Koreans will not give up their nuclear weapons. Read the Strategic Disengagement Theory:

    http://www.dprkstudies.org/2006/07/06/north-korea…

    As far as Obama what he will do in regards to North Korea we need to wait and see.

  • chefantwon
    2:17 am on January 20th, 2009 4

    If anyone ever thought that the short one would give up his nuclear weapons, you are sadly mistaken. Anything that gives him an advantage is an asset he will keep them around until he's dead.

    One has to remember of whom your dealing with here. A tyrant that has total control of just about everything in his country. He has a few tools that he rattles every so often to make him feel important. One is the missles, one the nukes, and a few more. Each time he uses or threatens to use any of them, folks in the region get very nervous. As long as his threats are taken seriously, he has power and he will do anything to keep and acquire power.

  • gerry
    2:42 am on January 20th, 2009 5

    GI KOREA,

    The article you referenced was very informative and I believe very true.

    On the other hand I have never been convinced that North Korea has the ability to produce a nuclear weapon much less the ability to reduce the size enough to put on the head of a missle.

    The underground "test" a few years back leaves a lot of unanswered questions and has not convinced me.

  • SRS
    9:31 am on January 20th, 2009 6

    Here is MSNBC giving a platform to Selig Harrison to talk about how the US must co-exist and respect the NK system and immediately give in to all NK demands and then they have promised him that they will talk about things :roll:

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/?vp=28733589…

  • gerry
    1:50 pm on January 20th, 2009 7

    SRS,

    Interesting interview. Give North Korea everything they want and more, and they will love us for it. North Korea just needs a big hug from President Obama, and they will give up the Nuclear weapons. It has been all our fault to begin with.

    Sniff, sniff, damn, why didn't we think of that before? This guy is a genius, he should be up for the Nobel Peace Prize. What a mind. Hand me another tissue please.

 

RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.

Bad Behavior has blocked 14676 access attempts in the last 7 days.