ROK Drop

By on May 1st, 2009 at 6:39 am

Obama Administrations Move to Release Gitmo Terrorists

» by in: Terrorism

So what does everyone think about the Obama administration wanting to move a terrorist into a house near you?

gitmo-graphic

Moving quickly to release Chinese Uighur terrorists into the United States, Obama administration officials have — for the second time — overridden objections of federal agencies responsible for national security.

The first time — as I reported on April 20 — the White House overrode the inter-agency panel it created from all the national security agencies to review all the cases of the Guantanamo Bay prisoners.  That panel found that the seventeen Uighurs — members of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement captured at an al-Queda training camp in Pakistan — were too dangerous to release in the United States.

Now — according to a federal agency source who requested anonymity — the White House has also overridden opposition to the release from both the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.

Beginning yesterday and continuing today, Obama administration officials are briefing key members of Congress on the release, which may happen as early as next week.  There apparently has been no decision on where the Uighurs will be turned loose.  Earlier reports suggested they could be released in Alexandria, Virginia or Washington, D.C.  [Human Events]

What caught my attention about this issue is that I just read this in the book I am currently reading:

Within the Uighur community are extremist groups who are radical Islamist fundamentalists dedicated to using terrorism to achieve their goals of independence.  (………..)

Just to be clear, these men are not choirboys who strayed on the path home from church services.  They were captured in Al Qaeda camps in Afghanistan, in which they were by their own admission undergoing training so that they could return to China to be terrorists supporting an independent Uighur Islamic nation.  In several cases they were captured by the Northern Alliance or its supporters and eventually screened by US forces.  Some reports on anti-war websites claim that the Uighurs were “sold” to Americans for $5,000 apiece, but this is an unconfirmed rumor.

The books goes on to describe their holding area that included communal living, great food, satellite TV, and an unmatched ocean view.  The US has been trying to find someone will to take these guys and this might explain why nobody wants them:

But the TV privileges underscored potential difficulties to come, according to one current and one former U.S. official. Not long after being granted access to TV, some of the Uighurs were watching a soccer game. When a woman with bare arms was shown on the screen, one of the group grabbed the television and threw it to the ground, according to the officials.  [LA Times]

So you all in Virginia have fun with your non-dangerous Uighur neighbors who smash TV’s at the first sighting of women with bare arms.

While our US government is busy finding homes in the US for terrorists, few North Korean defectors have been accepted by the United States with only one even receiving residency so far.  Anyway it will be interesting to see what the Chinese reaction will be to the US sheltering terrorists committed to fighting the Chinese if the Obama administration decides to release these guys in Virginia.

Tags: , , ,
- 540 views
4
  • USinKorea
    10:08 am on May 1st, 2009 1

    Your contrast with the number of NK refugees accepted is great.

    If we let these people loose inside the US……we've really flipped ourselves on our ears…

    I've been debating these things over at the blog for the magazine Commentary…

    …and what gets me is how critics of Gitmo and whatnot — seem to use as a foundation — some history I've never remembered hearing about.

    They act as if treating covert operatives and the like in the past had been a matter of routine domestic criminal law or as if every type of combatant/operative was routinely covered by one of the categories in the Geneva Conventions.

    It would be one thing if they were arguing that the past was wrong too, just as segregation and non-equal rights for women or slavery and so on, were mistakes of the past we shouldn't be repeating today.

    …if they were arguing that we should rise above our past and be more noble in how we treat these types of irregular combatants/covert operatives.

    But that isn't what they are saying. They act as if this kind of person wasn't sometimes summarily shot in the past. They act as if history treated these people much better than how they are being treated today…

    And this historical amnesia is part of the reason we are ending up doing such a bizzare thing.

    We can't send them to CHina or the like because they might be tortured, but we can't hold them, so we are going to release them among the very population they worked hard to help attack….

    What a strange time…..

  • gerry
    1:43 pm on May 1st, 2009 2

    Oh, the irony, releasing them in Washington DC. Bet, within a year, one of them wants to run for congress.

  • In Seoul
    2:07 pm on May 1st, 2009 3

    If they are going to release these guys in the United States, perhaps it would be fitting to do so in Senator Harry Reid’s city/town of residence or better yet Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi’s 8th district. :grin:

  • gerry
    2:15 pm on May 1st, 2009 4

    Yes, absolutely, let those who lead us, lead the way.

 

RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.

Bad Behavior has blocked 14582 access attempts in the last 7 days.