Comments on: US Loses Track of Taepodong-2, Is A 3rd Nuclear Test Imminent? http://rokdrop.com/2009/06/12/us-loses-track-of-taepodong-2-is-a-3rd-nuclear-test-imminent/ Korea From North to South Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:07:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: gerry http://rokdrop.com/2009/06/12/us-loses-track-of-taepodong-2-is-a-3rd-nuclear-test-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-336623 gerry Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:57:04 +0000 http://rokdrop.com/?p=14106#comment-336623 I agree that it makes no sense for the Pentagon to release data that they lost track of the TP2. My only guess is that some person in the new administration who is so bent on pentagon incompetence that it was his /her show of proof. Very unproffesional and dangerous to the country. I agree that it makes no sense for the Pentagon to release data that they lost track of the TP2. My only guess is that some person in the new administration who is so bent on pentagon incompetence that it was his /her show of proof. Very unproffesional and dangerous to the country.

]]> By: gerry http://rokdrop.com/2009/06/12/us-loses-track-of-taepodong-2-is-a-3rd-nuclear-test-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-336618 gerry Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:52:25 +0000 http://rokdrop.com/?p=14106#comment-336618 Thats seismic Thats seismic

]]> By: gerry http://rokdrop.com/2009/06/12/us-loses-track-of-taepodong-2-is-a-3rd-nuclear-test-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-336611 gerry Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:36:34 +0000 http://rokdrop.com/?p=14106#comment-336611 I have yet to see conclusive evidence that NK has exploded a nuclear weapon. I may be wrong, but of the two test explosions, neither have given conclusive evidence. 1st test, detection of radioactive air particles from Russia and sismac(sp) tremors, that would be equal to either a failed, or very low power nuke, 2nd test, no reports of radiation or other data other than the sismac(sp) tremor reported before the NKs anounced their so called test. Can a test be faked? Yes, with large amounts of non nuclear munitions. I think radioactivity in the air could also be faked. Add plutonium to the blast and let the material into the air. Too unsophisticated for the North to pull off? I have yet to see conclusive evidence that NK has exploded a nuclear weapon. I may be wrong, but of the two test explosions, neither have given conclusive evidence. 1st test, detection of radioactive air particles from Russia and sismac(sp) tremors, that would be equal to either a failed, or very low power nuke, 2nd test, no reports of radiation or other data other than the sismac(sp) tremor reported before the NKs anounced their so called test.

Can a test be faked? Yes, with large amounts of non nuclear munitions. I think radioactivity in the air could also be faked. Add plutonium to the blast and let the material into the air.

Too unsophisticated for the North to pull off?

]]> By: USinKorea http://rokdrop.com/2009/06/12/us-loses-track-of-taepodong-2-is-a-3rd-nuclear-test-imminent/comment-page-1/#comment-336408 USinKorea Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:02:36 +0000 http://rokdrop.com/?p=14106#comment-336408 I was thinking the same thing about the using up of nuke material. I wonder if there is a way the North would try faking nuke tests? I was thinking the same thing about the using up of nuke material.

I wonder if there is a way the North would try faking nuke tests?

]]>