The only problem I see with this conclusion is that the Chinese claim the Koguryo kingdom as part of their history as well, which makes this recent finding irrelevant:
A crown ornament bearing a striking resemblance to a Koguryo crown has been unearthed at a royal tomb of the Balhae Kingdom, while an epitaph states that the buried individual is an empress. The find by Chinese government researchers directly contradicts claims by the country’s Northeast Project that the Balhae Kingdom was a province of the Tang Dynasty.
The Jilin Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology and a team of researchers from the Office of the Yanbian Korean Nationality Autonomous Prefecture Commission for the Preservation of Ancient Monuments excavated 14 ancient tombs in the Helong region of Jilin Province dating back to the Balhae era. They published their findings in the latest issue of the journal “Chinese Archeology” published by the Institute of Archaeology at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. [Chosun Ilbo]









11:07 am on August 27th, 2009 1
Korean crown?
http://discovermagazine.com/2007/mar/return-of-the-bactrian-gold/48-crown-300.jpg
Nope, it’s Bactrian. It was found in what is now modern day Afghanistan.
Sorry, Korean and Chinese historians, but thanks to the silk road the design of an artifact found in Asia is not always a clear indicator of the artisan’s and the former owner’s ethnic origins.
Reply
3:12 pm on August 27th, 2009 2
TeaDrinker,
How does that pic from your link even resemble the crown above? And why don’t you read the full article.
http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2009/08/27/2009082700883.html
Reply