ROK Drop

By on October 21st, 2009 at 6:43 am

Korea & US Agree to Solution to Camp Pollution Issue

I have long chronicled the USFK camp pollution issue here on the ROK Drop and now finally it appears that a solution is at hand:

A thorny issue over who will pay for the environmental cleanup of U.S. military bases being vacated is finding an amicable solution, Korea’s top environment policymaker said.

“A survey initially underestimated the costs of cleaning up Camp Hialeah in Busan by 25 percent but U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) will take care of it before returning it,” said Environment Minister Lee Maan-ee during an exclusive interview with The Korea Times last week.

Regarding Camp Madison in Uiwang, south of Seoul, where an oil spill has been the target of public grievance, Lee said, “The USFK will conduct a survey and clean it up before returning it to us.”

Lee said he was the first environment minister to meet with the USFK commander, now Gen. Walter Sharp, adding that their agreement came during their meeting.

The 63-year-old minister also said the two countries are seriously considering a formula for settling future disputes over base cleanups in which the U.S. military would pay if new sources of contamination were found, even after the bases have been returned.

There is no clear clause regarding cleanup costs in the ROK-U.S. Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), and this has been a constant source of friction in the relocation of U.S. bases.  [Korea Times]

Considering that US forces have been working on these bases for decades there is of course going to be pollution from vehicle leaks for example.  The SOFA states when camps are handed over the Korean government takes them over “as is”.  However, USFK has gone well beyond the “as is” standard and has actually poured a lot of money into cleaning up the camps.

This hasn’t stopped the usual anti-US groups and individuals from making wildly absurd claims about the pollution levels on these camps.  These people could care less about pollution in Korea in general because their only concern is manufacturing anti-US sentiment. As many of you I’m sure remember, the environmental groups along with a large block of the DLP political party have been linked to a North Korean spy ring.

These lawmakers and environmentalists have little creditability and I suspect much of the camp pollution findings have been “Dr. Hwang-ed” for political purposes. I have long advocated for this but, I would love to see a detailed line by line report on the supposed environmental damage in every camp. What I suspect is going on is that these demagogues are making claims of pollution due to the presence of asphalt on the camps for example. Oil is used in making asphalt thus they can make claims of oil slicks on the camps based on the presence of asphalt.

For those who have never served in Korea, the USFK camps are literally an oasis of green in the middle of dense urban cities. The camps after the Korean war were located on the outskirts of Korean cities but the camps have now been swallowed up by the growing cities which are a sign of Korea’s amazing development since the war. It is partly because of this development that USFK wants to relocate the camps to the sparsely populated Camp Humphreys area. If anything the USFK camps are the cleanest piece of land in the surrounding communities and some have been designated to become parks when handed over; yet the anti-US groups have successfully used this issue for years now to create friction between USFK and the Korean populace.

Tags: , ,
- 794 views
7
  • LORDOFE2
    12:31 am on October 21st, 2009 1

    What if the USA agreed to clean it up, but would only use US employees. And they had to live on base. LOL

  • Teadrinker
    2:46 am on October 21st, 2009 2

    One of these groups (you can look up the name yourself) accused the USFK of using DU (depleted uranium) bombs about 10 years ago. The Korean media ate the story up. Nobody seemed bothered by the fact that bombs shown as evidence 1) hadn't exploded and 2) had fairly large holes drilled on their sides, and 3) didn't look like the kind of bombs that would be used to penetrate armor. All that mattered was that there was DU stenciled on their sides. Turns out DU was short for "dummy unit"… I don't recall any retractions.

  • Tom
    3:38 am on October 21st, 2009 3

    What's underneath all those green grassed US army camps?

    Is this just a Korea problem? According to all the Asian countries that are hosting US military bases, it is a very common complaint.

    http://www.britannica.com/bps/additionalcontent/1

    And this link's article says that if countries like Korea don't press the US to clean up the bases, the US would do nothing, like in less developed countries.

    http://www.albionmonitor.com/9809b/copyright/base

    Because there was pressure from Korean groups, something has been done. So the pressure has worked.

  • JohnT
    5:10 am on October 21st, 2009 4

    What excuse do koreans offer for that Tom? Guess it just koreans being friendly again.

  • Hamilton
    7:10 am on October 21st, 2009 5

    We call it stinky creek on Yongsan. The creek enters the base freely without any base waterways intersecting it at the entrance. It stinks to high heaven and has visable oil and contaminated water in it, but the green Korea groups only measure when it exits the base. What could be fairer? Cue Tom in three, two …

    It turned a bright orange-red about four months ago, spreading from off base to on base and clearing the same way. Ask yourself, what is cleaner, a USFK motorpool or a Korean MomandPops car center. No contest.

  • Chris
    7:26 am on October 21st, 2009 6

    Its a common complaint because these nations know they can squeeze money out of the US by whining about environmental problems on US facilities. Its not limited to Asia. Europeans do it too. In fact American states go on witch hunts on stateside military facilities. Back in the 90s, President Bush I signed into law a provision allowing this. So now state governments can jump on the gravy train!

    Personally, I mind it less when a German, Dutch, American state, etc. agency does this. I don't like it, but at least they practice what they preach. It is extra annoying when Koreans do this while standing ankle deep in discarded Lotteria wrappers and puddles of diesel fuel.

  • Sonagi
    9:10 am on October 21st, 2009 7

    "the anti-US groups have successfully used collaborated with the Korean media to use this issue for years now to create friction between USFK and the Korean populace."

    Fixed it for you.

 

RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.

Bad Behavior has blocked 15597 access attempts in the last 7 days.