Comments on: South Korean Technology Responsible for Naval Clash Win

By: gerry

gerry — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:42:47 +0000

I'm sorry, I didn't use "was" in my comment. Regardless, depending on someones grammer, spelling, etc. in a comment, is not a valid premise for denial.

By: noname

noname — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 03:07:43 +0000

And what is your basis for such speculation? And as I stated above, even if it were true, it does not mean more soldiers would be put in harm's way. You can criticize the Roh administration's North Korea policy all you want, but that remark on whether the soldiers would have lived is dumb (not to mention grammatically incorrect; it should be "were," not "was")

By: noname

noname — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 03:00:29 +0000

First of all, even if the Roh administration did try to downplay the 2002 incident for political purposes (which, btw, occurred in the administration previous to that), this does not necessarily mean it would have been any less concerned with the safety of ROK soldiers. Second, maybe you should also try looking at other sources instead of simply echoing the obviously biased and simplistic views on this blog. For instance, you could also look at: http://whiteclind.egloos.com/4254852

By: gerry

gerry — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:12:54 +0000

The experts would have been different and the fault murky. Perhaps an accident on the Navy's part or a misunderstanding.

By: Teadrinker

Teadrinker — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:45:37 +0000

http://rokdrop.com/2008/06/30/korean-government-m…

By: noname

noname — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:02:30 +0000

"Fortunately no ROK sailors were killed, but it makes you wonder that if Roh Moo-hyun was still President would the sailors on this boat still be alive or not?"

This is a pretty dumb comment, no? What does Roh's presidency have anything to do with the sailors' survival?

By: Teadrinker

Teadrinker — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:40:38 +0000

"Experts say the computer-controlled armaments of the South Korean boat was probably able to sustain concentrated fire more accurately than the North Korean boat."

Was it necessary to bother experts for that? It's as if reporters come in two varieties: the first ask experts to state the obvious, and the second likes to make unfounded claims, no matter how ludicrous they may be.