<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Land Mine Removal Open the DMZ to Refugees?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rokdrop.com/2009/12/23/will-land-mine-removal-open-the-dmz-to-refugees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rokdrop.com/2009/12/23/will-land-mine-removal-open-the-dmz-to-refugees/</link>
	<description>Korea From North to South</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:02:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reeearg</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2009/12/23/will-land-mine-removal-open-the-dmz-to-refugees/comment-page-1/#comment-399557</link>
		<dc:creator>Reeearg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/?p=18293#comment-399557</guid>
		<description>Reeeeeearrrrrggggg!!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reeeeeearrrrrggggg!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon LaPorte</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2009/12/23/will-land-mine-removal-open-the-dmz-to-refugees/comment-page-1/#comment-380635</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon LaPorte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/?p=18293#comment-380635</guid>
		<description>Partly true. I knew some guys who spent over a year up here locating mines. These guys were from the UK, Mozambique, US etc... The ROK (and maybe US) army actually blew or removed the mines. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Partly true. I knew some guys who spent over a year up here locating mines. These guys were from the UK, Mozambique, US etc&#8230; The ROK (and maybe US) army actually blew or removed the mines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2009/12/23/will-land-mine-removal-open-the-dmz-to-refugees/comment-page-1/#comment-380617</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/?p=18293#comment-380617</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&amp;article=67526&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The spokesman said removal of the mines is not part of any effort to clear the way for reunification of the peninsula, nor an indication of improving relations with North Korea. 
. 
. 
. 
The spokesman pointed out that the South Korean military has never removed land mines inside the DMZ and in its adjacent areas immediately to the south.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&amp;article=67526" rel="nofollow">The spokesman said removal of the mines is not part of any effort to clear the way for reunification of the peninsula, nor an indication of improving relations with North Korea.</p>
<p>.</p>
<p>.</p>
<p>.</p>
<p>The spokesman pointed out that the South Korean military has never removed land mines inside the DMZ and in its adjacent areas immediately to the south.</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: someotherguy</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2009/12/23/will-land-mine-removal-open-the-dmz-to-refugees/comment-page-1/#comment-378440</link>
		<dc:creator>someotherguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/?p=18293#comment-378440</guid>
		<description>South Korea doesn&#039;t have nukes, we gave them nuclear power technology awhile back so they wouldn&#039;t research how to get nukes (to get nuclear power you  must first learn to build the bomb basically). 
 
And the Japanese are seriously looking into restating part of their constitution.  They&#039;ve already made it clear that a first strike to protect Japan is allowed under the self defense clause.  Of course they did this during the time NK was launching missiles over the Japanese mainland. 
 
Seriously the Japanese are a country you don&#039;t want to screw with.  KJI picks a fight then the next thing he knows he got some sort of flying robotic army all over his a$$. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South Korea doesn&#039;t have nukes, we gave them nuclear power technology awhile back so they wouldn&#039;t research how to get nukes (to get nuclear power you  must first learn to build the bomb basically).</p>
<p>And the Japanese are seriously looking into restating part of their constitution.  They&#039;ve already made it clear that a first strike to protect Japan is allowed under the self defense clause.  Of course they did this during the time NK was launching missiles over the Japanese mainland.</p>
<p>Seriously the Japanese are a country you don&#039;t want to screw with.  KJI picks a fight then the next thing he knows he got some sort of flying robotic army all over his a$$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teadrinker</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2009/12/23/will-land-mine-removal-open-the-dmz-to-refugees/comment-page-1/#comment-378437</link>
		<dc:creator>Teadrinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/?p=18293#comment-378437</guid>
		<description>&quot;Korean friend of mine once told me keeping North Korea going was important because Korea as a whole needs nukes to counter-balance the Japanese and Chinese.&quot; 
 
I can believe China, but the Japanese constitution has pretty much neutered its armed forces, so you&#039;re friends are being irrational.   
 
Besides, South Korea most probably has nukes. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Korean friend of mine once told me keeping North Korea going was important because Korea as a whole needs nukes to counter-balance the Japanese and Chinese.&quot;</p>
<p>I can believe China, but the Japanese constitution has pretty much neutered its armed forces, so you&#039;re friends are being irrational.  </p>
<p>Besides, South Korea most probably has nukes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris In Dallas</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2009/12/23/will-land-mine-removal-open-the-dmz-to-refugees/comment-page-1/#comment-378421</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris In Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/?p=18293#comment-378421</guid>
		<description>The One Free Korea article seems to assume the ROK government and citizenry wants NorK refugees and/or to destabilize DPRK.  Everything I have seen an heard regarding that points in quite the opposite direction.  I think the notion they did it to cut down on ROK injuries is much more likely along with a little PR for the outside. 
 
I really don&#039;t understand Koreans when it comes to reunification.  They are at least as nationalistic as we Americans are.  My guess is if a hunk of America were being ruled by a tyrant, we would crush them at the earliest possible moment, expenses be damned!  I have heard only one sensible explanation on this.  Korean friend of mine once told me keeping North Korea going was important because Korea as a whole needs nukes to counter-balance the Japanese and Chinese.  Since ROK is a respectable nation, it can&#039;t nuke up while their roguish brethren to the north can.  Awfully cynical, but its an awfully more palatable rationalization than Koreans in ROK are just too rich, happy and lazy to be bothered with the whole mess. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The One Free Korea article seems to assume the ROK government and citizenry wants NorK refugees and/or to destabilize DPRK.  Everything I have seen an heard regarding that points in quite the opposite direction.  I think the notion they did it to cut down on ROK injuries is much more likely along with a little PR for the outside.</p>
<p>I really don&#039;t understand Koreans when it comes to reunification.  They are at least as nationalistic as we Americans are.  My guess is if a hunk of America were being ruled by a tyrant, we would crush them at the earliest possible moment, expenses be damned!  I have heard only one sensible explanation on this.  Korean friend of mine once told me keeping North Korea going was important because Korea as a whole needs nukes to counter-balance the Japanese and Chinese.  Since ROK is a respectable nation, it can&#039;t nuke up while their roguish brethren to the north can.  Awfully cynical, but its an awfully more palatable rationalization than Koreans in ROK are just too rich, happy and lazy to be bothered with the whole mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://rokdrop.com/2009/12/23/will-land-mine-removal-open-the-dmz-to-refugees/comment-page-1/#comment-378415</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rokdrop.com/?p=18293#comment-378415</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking that these mines were not removed from the DMZ itself, but rather &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kcbl.or.kr/bbs/view.php?id=pds_etc&amp;page=9&amp;sn1=&amp;divpage=1&amp;sn=off&amp;ss=on&amp;sc=on&amp;select_arrange=headnum&amp;desc=asc&amp;no=20&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rear areas&lt;/a&gt; south of the DMZ, especially around airfields and air defense sites.  The DMZ still has a mine density of 2.3 per square meter, and I don&#039;t think the North Koreans will be removing their mines anytime soon unless they, the US, and South Korea all three join the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottawa_Treaty&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ottawa Treaty&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m thinking that these mines were not removed from the DMZ itself, but rather <a href="http://www.kcbl.or.kr/bbs/view.php?id=pds_etc&amp;page=9&amp;sn1=&amp;divpage=1&amp;sn=off&amp;ss=on&amp;sc=on&amp;select_arrange=headnum&amp;desc=asc&amp;no=20" rel="nofollow">rear areas</a> south of the DMZ, especially around airfields and air defense sites.  The DMZ still has a mine density of 2.3 per square meter, and I don&#039;t think the North Koreans will be removing their mines anytime soon unless they, the US, and South Korea all three join the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottawa_Treaty" rel="nofollow">Ottawa Treaty</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

