ROK Drop

By on July 27th, 2010 at 3:08 am

A Korean Progressive On Marxism

If you can believe it, there is a Korean progressive that doesn’t follow Marxism:

Choi Jang-jip, one of the most well-known progressive political philosophers in Korea, didn’t include Karl Marx in his latest lecture list. Marxism is well-read in Korea’s intellectual community and for those in the progressive camp, it is especially enshrined as the “only knowledge.”

So, Choi’s decision not to include Marxism comes as surprise.

“I intentionally excluded Marxism,” Choi said in an unabashed manner in an interview with the local JoongAng Ilbo newspaper Saturday.

“The problem with Marxism is that there is no role for politics in it. That’s why Marxism failed in reality. Marxism was inadequate to deal with the problem of power because it attached almost unilateral importance to the ideals and mandates to follow, without reflecting political reality,” he said.

Choi said the Korean society is already full of such idealism and sales pitches of “what must be done.”
“What today’s Korean society needs the most is not this kind of idealized mandates, but the ability to carry out good politics grounded in reality,” he said.

“The absence of ‘politics’ in the Korean society is the biggest enemy to democracy,” he argued.

For that matter, Choi said, he thinks what the Korean society needs now is Machiavelli, not Marx.

“Don’t get me wrong. That’s just my diagnosis for the reality of the Korean society,” he said, apparently defending his choice of Machiavelli as a symbol for a political philosopher who is well-connected with reality, who detached himself from the Marxian idealism.  [Korea Times]

I think it probably has more to do with the fact that Marxism has such a negative connotation to it now a days that many progressives don’t want to be labeled by that term even if they agree with policies from Marx.

Tags: ,
- 98 views
8
  • Glans
    6:51 am on July 27th, 2010 1

    Marx never governed a country.

  • E.D.
    8:43 am on July 27th, 2010 2

    And thats too bad…..

  • Teadrinker
    9:12 am on July 27th, 2010 3

    #1,

    Yes, he certainly didn't. His arguments were either contradictory or paradoxical, depending on how you view them. For example, he condemned morality as a means to enslave the masses, which is a rather moralistic opinion. Frankly, it's no surprise to me that societies deeply influenced by Marxism are/were dystopian caricatures.

  • Glans
    10:09 am on July 27th, 2010 4

    Teadrinker 3, I suppose dystopia-prone leaders found Marxism useful. If someone actually trying to do good finds any insights in Marx's writings, he should apply them carefully, not dogmatically.

  • Teadrinker
    3:01 pm on July 27th, 2010 5

    #4,

    Sure, Marx was not a Marxist.

  • archieb
    5:44 pm on July 27th, 2010 6

    OK, so if the South Korean left is NOT following an ideology-Marxism- then what is it doing? It is openly supporting a foreign power during a time of war.

  • Glans
    2:28 pm on October 29th, 2011 7

    If you thought Marxist-Leninists were masters of Hegelian dialectic, and even if you didn’t, you might want to take a look at modern dialectic.

  • yoursurprise-1
    1:44 pm on December 7th, 2011 8

    Cool blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A design like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my blog jump out. Please let me know where you got your theme. Thanks a lot

 

RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.

Bad Behavior has blocked 13831 access attempts in the last 7 days.