By That is the question being asked over at This Ain’t Hell:
Now, I really don’t believe in the death penalty, not for the reasons you might think. In my opinion, I don’t trust the government to take anyone’s life. I mean, would you put your life in the hands of Charlie Rangel or Maxine Waters? Anyway, I’m opposed to Manning’s execution regardless of how his trial turns out. (……………..)
At that point, I realize that the only way to make sure Manning serves out his sentence without some pompous and arrogant windbag like Moore advocating for his undeserved early release from his 90,000 life sentences is to kill Manning. [This Ain't Hell]
The Moore he is referring to is Michael Moore who has taken up Manning’s cause and thinks he is in fact some kind of hero instead of the traitor that he clearly is. The way I look at it is if Hasan Akbar wasn’t executed for killing his own fellow soldiers and I doubt that Nidal Malik Hasan will be executed either for his act or terrorism, so that makes me seriously doubt this latest turd will be executed. I think the he should receive a jail sentence equal to Akbar and Hasan, but it will be interesting to see how this turns out considering he is now the latest celebrity criminal for the far left.
So do you think he should be executed? Vote below:
1:13 am on August 7th, 2010 1
Kill him. He has put personnel and civilians in danger in so many ways it is hard to believe. The Taliban will hunt down and kill anyone in the documents, they have a very clear track record of doing so. The informants can flee or be killed and many of them are not well off, they are just tired of the Taliban. In the very least the intel sources will dry up, killing civilians and military alike. In many ways I believe he did what he did because he didn't think there would be any consequence for him. We might disuade the next lunatic from doing the same thing.
1:17 am on August 7th, 2010 2
Has the military gone soft? These people have done heinous crimes against the United States. Is it better to keep this criminals in prison for a lengthy term or just execute them? Does it send good messages to our enemies that we take our enemies alive or dead?
1:28 am on August 7th, 2010 3
This loser sort of looks like a girl. He probably is a computer geek who went nuts playing endless hours of video games.
By the way, I've seen Army computer security and it's very lame. I believe it when I hear they had CD/DVD burners on their classified computers.
1:42 am on August 7th, 2010 4
Akbar might still be executed, what you talking about?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasan_Akbar_case#Ver…
* On 21 April 2005 Akbar was found guilty of two counts of premeditated murder (of Army Capt. Christopher Seifert, 27, who was shot in the back, and Air Force Maj. Gregory Stone, 40, struck by shrapnel) and three counts of attempted premeditated murder.[9] He was sentenced to death on 28 April, the jury deliberating for approximately 7 hours.[10]
* On 20 November 2006 Lieutenant General John Vines, commander of the 18th Airborne Corps, affirmed the death sentence against Akbar.[3] The case now goes to the Army Court of Criminal Appeals under an automatic appeal. If the appeal fails, the execution will take place by lethal injection.
Since the Vietnam War, Akbar is the first U.S. soldier to be charged with the murder of another soldier during wartime, and the third soldier since the Vietnam War to be sentenced to death for killing a fellow soldier, though William Kreutzer Jr.'s sentence was commuted to life. The last U.S. military execution was that of John A. Bennett in 1961.
1:45 am on August 7th, 2010 5
Here's a link to Manning's charge sheet
http://www.fas.org/irp/news/2010/07/manning070510…
Confinement for 20 months, foreitfure of all pay and allowances, reduction to E1 and a Dishonorable Discharge.
His sentence will be less than that handed out in the "Napster" case or 75% of "non-violent" crimes.
2:36 am on August 7th, 2010 6
Does it really all matter?
Face it. This whole War on Terror thing has been one big expensive and non-productive fcuk-around since it started… both overseas and domestically.
Just about nothing has been accomplished in the last 9 years… even less if you look at it from a cost/benefit perspective.
The justification for invading Iraq was known to be a lie at the time… and there was little plan for what to do next. Nobody has even tried to make a good excuse for the perpetual occupation of Afghanistan…
…and, in both cases, there really doesn't seem to be any obtainable objectives being suggested… mostly because nobody will give a clear definition of what "victory" is supposed to look like, let alone, how to get it.
The last two presidents, and leading politicians from both parties, have continuously lied about every aspect of these wars while following the same expansive policies… which do more to increase government involvement in all aspects of domestic affairs, spend incredible sums of deficit-funded money on non-productive ventures at the expense of pressing national interests, etc.
To top it off, the American public has been dumbed down with reality TV and preoccupied with XBox Live… and they mostly have little time or interest to follow the war and its politics… except for the soundbite-dominated misrepresentations that consists of the "news".
So… what do these leaks really mean?
Are they some sort of important top secret information that stands between failure and victory?
No. They are sensitive documents only because they confirm what many had already suspected. Things are hopelessly fcuked up… probably worse than the public even suspected… and maybe more than some politicians and military members suspected, too.
So, what do these leaks confirm? I quote:
- a disastrous guerrilla war that the public had already turned decisively against
- military operations that both tactically and strategically are a mess beyond any reasonable hope of repair
- intelligence operations that are acquiring almost no accurate, much less actionable, information about anything
- American officials who appear to have no answers to the daily intractable problems they face in an increasingly unpopular occupation
- an Afghan population that has huge and legitimate grievances against heavy-handed US attacks
- an Afghan government that is corrupt, incompetent, and mistrusted in more ways than most of us could have imagined
- grossly untrustworthy Afghan army and police forces
- obscenely fraught relations with our untrustworthy “allies” in the region
- an enemy that is better armed and more adaptable and successful than the public has been told
- the history of a war that went to pieces far earlier than the US government had told the public
- specific details about military operations that contradict what the US public had been told in the past
So, in the end, did Bradly Manning leak some secrets that will bring about the downfall of the United States… or did he do it a service by giving hard evidence of the political and military incompetence that is perpetuating non-productive, unending, resource-squandering war that may cause real problems for the United States for years to come…
…hard evidence that might wake the public up enough to demand accountability from the politicians who have no problem sending others' sons (and daughters) off to kill and die (without beer and cigarettes) while they attend fancy parties and boldly speak of "staying the course" and "spreading freedom and democracy".
History will tell.
An under-reported side note, by the way, Bradly Manning is an open and angry gay activist. So much for DADT.
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/arc…
3:20 am on August 7th, 2010 7
Chickenhead, you are smarter than that!
Carlyle Group
6:47 am on August 7th, 2010 8
Manning is the poster queer for the gay rights movement and the repeal of DADT. I think being homo should automatically deny you a security clearance but I guess others think differently.
8:14 am on August 7th, 2010 9
Couldn't we just send him to live in a little hunt in the FATA area between Afghanistan and Pakistan…
A hunt with a nice painting of Old Glory on the side?
Problem solved.
8:46 am on August 7th, 2010 10
Kill him. Firing Squad. I'll save the expense. I have a nice SKS that needs breaking in.
Or airdrop him into the enemy's loving arms with an MRE and 1 quart canteen.
8:53 am on August 7th, 2010 11
of course everyone is a hero to the liberal wackos if they hate the US and everything it stands for
10:24 am on August 7th, 2010 12
It matters not if anyone agrees with the war or not. He is a traitor during wartime. He should receive the maximum penalty, gay or straight. The shear volume of documents leaked proves he made no effort to review the information and how damaging it might be; not that he was in any position do do so. Perhaps if someone on the general officer level had leaked some carefully chosen but key documents in an effort to open a debate on the war it would have been one thing. A knowledgeable man following his conscience. This is just a private run a muck.
10:24 am on August 7th, 2010 13
Oh, and never trust a soldier who listens to Lady GaGa.
11:11 am on August 7th, 2010 14
I guess the whole 'treason is punishable by death' thing doesn't matter any more…
11:25 am on August 7th, 2010 15
While we're on the topic of service members who deserve to die, I suggest LTC Lakin for the honor. That fcukface b1tch is a disgrace.
4:54 pm on August 7th, 2010 16
The Taliban has already said that they would closely examine the leaked documents to finds Afghans who have helped us & that those people would be killed. This 'soldier' is an accomplice to murder and a traitor. You're damn right he should be executed preferably by beheading. I didn't know until I read Chickenheads post #6 that he was a fudgepacker as well. What a worthless POS.
5:04 pm on August 7th, 2010 17
Lets just turn him over to the Taliban, they can have their way with him, then do away with him. He'll be giving head before he loses his head.
6:17 pm on August 7th, 2010 18
Manning is just a punk. He is nothing special. As a PFC he probably had interem TS/SBI and had a SIPRNET account. He just went to portals and downloaded documents. The faggot/bi sexual/wanna be transgender ass was only an intel clerk! He is a traitor and deserves life in prison and yes…..hopoefully executed! He will meet pleanty of the kind of guys he likes in prison. Hopefully they will puncture his stomach while they ass fu*k him and he bleeds to death!
6:18 pm on August 7th, 2010 19
Compare this to what the Walker family spy ring did and none of them were given death sentences. http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/terrorists_spi…
#16
Some who have seen the documents describe them as a lower classification that should not contain any sources.
6:22 pm on August 7th, 2010 20
From the military, to the politicians to the leaker, there are no heroes in this story…
…but it is amazing to see the feeding frenzy calling for his head… or worse…
…and it might be the correct course of action to insure loyalty to the mission…
…or it might discourage others who truly want to do the right thing…
…because, regardless of this situation, the right thing is not being done… and, it should be hard to be fully against someone who is willing to expose that.
Anyway…
"The Taliban has already said that they would closely examine the leaked documents to finds Afghans who have helped us & that those people would be killed."
That's a good point. Keep in mind these mostly aren't innocent lambs welcoming the Western Crusaders with open arms.
As the leaked documents have revealed, they are mostly scumbags who sold out their friends/associate/tribes or they are players who sold out their competitors/adversaries/other tribes… feeding questionable information to manipulate the American military into doing their dirty work for them and, in the process, getting a big chunk of money that should educate your children, provide you healthcare, fix your roads, lower your gas prices, advance your space program, (insert just about anything else here), etc.
Once again, there are no heroes in this story… short of the grunts, perhaps, who are just trying to kill the "bad guys" despite all the limitations, restrictions, guidelines and non-mission essential considerations.
There have been a number of other real spies who have leaked important secrets to America's enemies and semi-allies… for both money and ideology… yet they have not been put to death… so don't get your hopes up here.
6:37 pm on August 7th, 2010 21
ChickenHead 6 says, "The last two presidents, and leading politicians from both parties, have continuously lied about every aspect of these wars…" What lies has Obama told?
8:31 pm on August 7th, 2010 22
"What lies has Obama told?"
Remember all those lies Bush told?
Obama is using all the same rhetoric to support rationalizations and justifications for perpetual war… and is increasing the number of troops with the vague promise of a "victory" that cannot be defined… and, as the recent leaks demonstrated, is likely impossible.
An example of this might be…
On August 17, 2009, President Obama defended the US invasion of Afghanistan. He called it “fundamental to the defense of our people,” and said, “But we must never forget this is not a war of choice, this is a war of necessity. If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which al-Qaeda would plot to kill more Americans."
Gosh. Sounds like Bush, don't it?
Does anyone, after a moment of thought, believe caves in Afghanistan are a better place to plot against the United States than any major city with banking, communication, supplies and a few million people's background chatter to hide behind?
As long as Obama is championing a war that NOBODY here has been able to explain the exact purpose of, he is lying.
9:01 pm on August 7th, 2010 23
@ #3-well Nuckfuts, if we didn't have DVD burners, how would we transfer data on standalone SECRET computers, since we can't use USBs right now?
9:15 pm on August 7th, 2010 24
ChickenHead 21, Obama's statements which you quoted sound like Bush and are crap, but they're not lies. If I said, "ChickenHead's comment about Obama was foolish, and GI Korea should delete it," my own statement would be debatable, but it wouldn't be a lie. A lie is something like, "ChickenHead is an unregistered Martian agent," a factual falsehood.
10:00 pm on August 7th, 2010 25
CH, your cover is blown.
Glans, stay where you are and don't panic. Some nice men will be by to collect you shortly. They only want to ask you a few questions.
10:40 pm on August 7th, 2010 26
I don't know, Glans…
It honestly sounds like lies to me.
"fundamental to the defense of our people"
Anybody care to explain how jerking around in a distant wasteland defends the American people?
"But we must never forget this is not a war of choice, this is a war of necessity."
Once again, I fail to see the necessity… although, if anybody cares to explain what 9 years of war there has accomplished, is supposed to accomplish or why it is necessary, I'm all ears.
"If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which al-Qaeda would plot to kill more Americans."
Once again, anti-Americans can plot anywhere they want. They don't need a cave in Afghanistan. Somehow "checking" them keeps them from attacking America?
So are these statements "factual falsehoods"? Maybe.
They are certainly statements intended to mislead, misdirect and sell an agenda unrelated to the actual situation.
At the least, they are statements of opinion being passed off as absolute truth.
And, in most cases, that is called "lying".
1:15 am on August 8th, 2010 27
Hmmm…
Another thing to ponder.
According to WikiLeaks…
"We have delayed the release of some 15,000 reports from the total archive as part of a harm minimization process demanded by our source."
This indicates there was some concern about the content of the leaked information by both WikiLeaks and the "source"… presumably Manning.
"After further review, these reports will be released, with occasional redactions, and eventually in full, as the security situation in Afghanistan permits."
Obviously, they will eventually release them because, "That's what we do."
But, they seem to have some concern over damaging content. And, as a side note, despite a lot of people pouring over the documents and a lot of hype over what damaging information they MIGHT contain, there have been no smoking guns worthy of media attention… just a pattern of a general lack of direction and excessive tail-chasing as many already suspected.
Keep in mind, I'm not exactly advocating what happened… nor am I excusing Bradley Manning for his actions. I do believe, however, that the situation is not exactly as it is being represented… and I believe that misrepresentation is potentially as damaging as the overall misrepresentation these leaks reveal.
In other news, Wikileaks is claiming they asked the Pentagon to review these documents with them for the purposes of "harm minimization". The Pentagon denied this… but, obviously, the offer has now been publicly made and the Pentagon is making excuses and avoiding direct questions.
My money is on the Pentagon telling the fib here.
Of course, I can understand that the Pentagon doesn't want to be in the position of helping the foxes eat the hens, even if they get to help select the unlucky hens, but it kinda shows the pride over practicality that is often the problem in government.
In this case it might be best for them to keep their enemies closer.
Anyway, those are a few things to ponder.
In the end, very little about the last 9 years of war has the best interests of anybody here in mind… and, perhaps, not even the interest of the United States as a nation… seeming more beneficial to certain industries, several multinationals and a few connected individuals… and very little (or nothing) to really show for all the effort on a national level.
With this in mind, and the tendency for incorrect actions to be hidden by arbitrary and unnecessary classification and a general lack of transparency, I'm finding it hard to condemn these leaks… which seem to have done no real damage except to show the Emperor has very threadbare clothes.
For you die-hard "Kill the Faggot" types, don't get all hater on me for these opinions. My ideas on the issue are still being formed and I'm very vulnerable to swings of opinion if new information or reasonable points of view come my way.
3:03 am on August 8th, 2010 28
CH, they delayed 15,000 reports so they can stay in the news longer. They did nothing to protect the names of the Afghanistan informants in the released documents. With their horde of volunteers it would not have taken long to release a large amount of documents.
Don't trust the Pentagon if you want, but he man who carefully edited AH-64 gun footage to omit the RPG and AK carrying men and labeled it "Collateral Murder" is not the honest broker you make him out to be. He didn't actually suspect anyone on the left would care if he left the names in and he was mostly correct.
As for the informants, you speculate they are not "clean" themselves. This is speculation, my speculation is that more than a few people are tired of the Taliban blowing up schools, cutting the noses off women and killing unarmed doctors. They are now in risk and fewer will take a risk to rid their country of these parasites.
As for Manning, he is a traitor, I couldn't care less if was into necrofilia. His actions have put US servicemen in danger as well as civilians and he is unrepentive.
Forget the SKS Retired GI, I've got a knife and stabbing is free. He isn't worth a cartridge.
6:08 am on August 8th, 2010 29
What lies has Obama told?
He said he was going to share the wealth? I'm still waiting for my check!
7:16 am on August 8th, 2010 30
So Obama hasn't made any specific factual statements that he knew to be false. Let's diasagree with him when he's wrong, but let's not accuse him of lying.
Now, back to the topic. "Should the WikiLeaker Bradley Manning Be Executed By the US Military?" By that, do we mean, "Should Manning be prosecuted, with the opportunity to defend himself, and if convicted of a crime for which the statutory penalty is death, should he then be executed?" Or do we mean, "To heck with the law. Should we just kill him?"
10:03 am on August 8th, 2010 31
"So Obama hasn’t made any specific factual statements that he knew to be false."
Glans, I see your point. Maybe you are right.
How about this example… which I just made up… which I think will become the new Gold Standard for this type of explanation.
Think of me when y'all use it from now on.
Suppose I went around and told everybody that I knew for a fact that you had your tongue in your mom's pusssy.
Euuuugh! You sick fcuk!
I would be factually correct, of course…
…unless you were delivered by c-section.
So, if I speak only true statements… yet intentionally mislead everyone's thinking by misrepresenting the facts, am I still being honest?
Or would you consider it to be a lie to leave the impression that you are some kind of pervert… even though all statements were factually correct?
This type of misrepresentation, even while relating the "facts", is an integral part of everything from Stars & Stripes reporting to every speech a politician has ever made.
Obama is no different… and to claim that he, and most other politicians, is not misrepresenting many aspects of the War on Terror is rather insincere on your part.
9:18 pm on August 8th, 2010 32
Bradley Manning is no more guilty of dispersing classified material than I am. Even the Admirals and Generals who have seen the 91,000 documents say there is nothing important in them anyway. (They must be very fast readers)
As to the other "terrorists", they have one thing in common. The Shoe Bomber, the Crotch Bomber and the New York Times Square idiot that left his car running all have one common failure. They all forgot to bring blasting caps to detonate their plastic explosives!! Each and every time I attended a demolition class, even those taught by the CIA, a blasting cap, electric or non electric, was necessary to detonate the charge. At no time were the two airplanes full of passengers in any danger nor were the happy folks in Times Square. Those with military experience KNOW that you can't set off C4 with a bullet, fire or throwing rocks at it. That is the reason the military uses plastic explosive. In the winter we used to heat our food with C4. What does all this mean? That they are all "FALSE FLAG" operations, designed to raise the "pucker factor"–fear, so that additional Draconian Measures may be taken that chip away at our Constitutional Rights. BTW, the first five words of the First Amendment are: CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW….and it appears that congress has redacted those words because of laws enacted in the past ten years!
At the great risk of being labeled a "conspiracy theorist", a label that the media coined for those of us who questioned the Warren Commissions finding that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in killing JFK (therefore NO conspiracy occurred which is two or more people PLANNING to commit a crime, and that in itself is a crime). That left the assassins and those who hired them off the hook! That is liking breaking the chain of evidence in a criminal trial. That is tantamount to killing a man hired to kill someone when the killer comes to receive his payment. Those acts break the chain of evidence.
And then we come to 911, where the CRIME SCENE OF A MASS MURDER was obliterated, trampled, driven over and what evidence survived has been secreted away in government vaults. Ask yourself what sort of power would be required to launch a configuration of steel, 105 tons in weight, in an arc 350 feet across the street from World Trade Center One and be impaled in the Deutsche Bank Building? And that is just for starters. Homicide investigators ask themselves one question at the start of business: Cui Bono? Who Benefits from this crime? Who has the technology to commit mass murder on 911? Some guy sitting in a cave in the mountains of Afghanistan?
Three years ago the FBI Special Agent in Charge of Counter Terrorism was asked why the Most Wanted poster of Osama bin Laden did not mention the crimes of 911. The Agent responded: "There is no direct evidence that Osama bin Laden had anything to do with the events of 911".
If you care to Google "Tritium and Deuterium found TOGETHER in the basements of WTC One and Two" you will find that the only way Tritium and Deuterium, which are elements of Hydrogen, can be found together, according to nuclear physicists, is from the detonation of a pure Hydrogen Explosion. Couple that with Quantum Mechanics and Nanotechnology and you will find the Fourth Generation of Nuclear Weapons (mini nukes that fit inside of a matchbox).
http://www.google.de/search?client=firefox-a&…
Just think a moment….without 911 there would be no Patriot Act, War Powers Act, Military Commissions Act nor two preemptive invasions of sovereign nations who did not attack the USA!
Preemptive Invasions are the ultimate War Crime! We hanged people for just that after the International War Crimes Tribunal in Nuremberg. President Truman appointed Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson to be the lead prosecutor at Nuremberg. His opening remarks to the Jury included: "The standards by which we judge these defendants (Nazis) today are the standards by which we shall be judged tomorrow:. Then we hanged them.
http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com/id472.html
http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com/id48.html
http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com/id1.html
Related articles are located in the left column of each page.
Bests,
John McCarthy
vpocvs@gmail.com
10:35 pm on August 8th, 2010 33
All of those mentioned committed deeds worthy of death…
6:43 am on August 9th, 2010 34
Chickenhead, again you make great points.
6:23 pm on August 10th, 2010 35
I'm opposed to the death penalty, but also not for reasons you'd think.
It just isn't applied fairly. A woman who commits cold blooded murder is less likely to get the death penalty than a man who does, and since it is hard to get a jury to send a woman to the chair, prosecutors actually ask for the death penalty in such cases far less for men than for women. The usual response by a woman to this is to say, "But men commit most murder and violent crime," but (1) that's not what I said, I said "when a woman commits," not "more men get the death penalty," and (2) it's because of that response that I'm all the more convinced I'm right about my position. Should men be executed when they deserve it more than women when they deserve it, because they deserve it more often?
When one is opposed to capital punishment because it isn't being applied fairly, all the abstract questions like whether it's moral or not, Christian or not, whether the state should be in the biz in the first place, etc, etc, really don't matter. Even if it's moral and justified and even if we could trust the govt (like you've discussed), in a world where prosecutors would rather ask for life and get a conviction than ask for the death penalty and risk giving the jury more reason to have "reasonable doubt" because the accused is a woman or someone you want(ed) to like (like OJ), then I'd rather everyone just get life because I know that's not what I'd get in the same circumstances.
9:20 pm on August 10th, 2010 36
I too am opposed to the death penalty. Someone should just kill him.
2:53 am on November 27th, 2010 37
to ch and all you liberal scum are you now or have you ever been a member of the communist party or a communist front group,workers party.?that little faggot should be executed as well as the pervert in sweden.
10:08 am on November 30th, 2010 38
Give him to the taliban so they can get a head in life lol.
10:38 am on November 30th, 2010 39
Prosecute him and if found guilty throw him in Leavenworth. No matter what his life is toast, with that kind of mark on his record he'll never get a decent high paying job because no company worth a damn will trust him. His actions have caused and will cause people to die, that is an inevitable outcome of disclosing HUMINT sources. His actions will cause the deaths of his own fellow service members, with less HUMINT there will be less forewarning about planned ambush's which leads to more US causalities.
@CH PoTUS Obama hasn't spoken any lies only supported his own Military commanders. As I've mentioned many times before being a moderate is hard. The liberals hate you because your not liberal enough, the conservatives hate you because your not conservative enough and other moderates are too quiet and worried about their own backs to lend much if any support. I don't envy him his job.
12:00 pm on November 30th, 2010 40
Chickenhead, Machine #38 is giving you a run for your money. Seriously this SOB is a traitor. Treason is a capital crime, end of story.
1:48 pm on November 30th, 2010 41
Q: How does Bradly Manning compare to your Filipina juicy?
A: The are both small and cute and locked up every night… but Bradly leaked BEFORE he got fcuked.
Q: What armored vehicle test can now be done at Leavenworth?
A: How to fit more than six men in the back of a Bradly.
Q: How do you know if Bradly has enough cellmates?
A: When you have full manning.
Q: What does Tom Langley and the homosexual community completely agree on?
A: Bradly Manning should be well hung.
2:22 pm on November 30th, 2010 42
Chickenhead #41, You are so f'ing hilarious that I can't believe it. I'm dead serious, you need to either be a comic writer or you need to do stand-up comedy. You'd make a mint & oh, BTW I want 10% of what you make for suggesting the idea. I take back my comment in post #40, NOBODY can hold a candle to you.
11:24 pm on December 3rd, 2010 43
I say behead him! Sound like some people we know?
2:39 am on December 4th, 2010 44
Bradley in prison
will have no computer but
will take more downloads
2:16 pm on December 4th, 2010 45
I'm sure that Bradley Manning's cellie will regularly download his hard drive.
3:10 pm on December 4th, 2010 46
#43 That sounds like Muslims but there are a few differences here.
1. Manning by his own confession (unrepentant) is a traitor and has put thousands of lives in danger as well as made diplomatic and civil reconstruction much harder. Known crime with known consequences.
2. The US doesn't behead anyone. He should get a lethal injection.
3. Muslims aren't calling for Manning's execution.
Did you really have any point to make?
8:00 am on February 14th, 2011 47
Well if they do execute him then I also think they should execute that arse of an ex-president der der Bush and also all the clowns of his inner circle, dick cheney, that ugly black woman.. condoleeza rice was it?? and all the others.
Also the chopper gunner who commited war crimes by blowing away people who were walking down the street.. then taking the piss further by shooting the van that had kids inside.. so how come he isn't in any trouble?? probably got a damm medal for it, knowing the clowns in charge.
Bradley Manning.. the real American Hero