By STRATFOR has published an article recently on the attempt by the South Korean government to renegotiate its current nuclear agreement with the US:
South Korea and the United States will begin negotiations Oct. 25 on revisions to their bilateral nuclear cooperation agreement. Under the pact, signed in 1974, Seoul must get Washington’s permission to enrich uranium and reprocessed used nuclear fuel — a provision that Seoul says impedes its ambitious nuclear energy program. The United States will have concerns stemming from its nonproliferation efforts elsewhere around the world, as well as from the potential for increased tensions on the Korean Peninsula. [STRATFOR]
Basically the South Koreans wanted to be treated with the same status of India who does not have such restrictions placed on their nuclear activities. I think South Korea has long shown that they are a nation responsible enough to enrich uranium and reprocess nuclear fuel. The US fear appears that by allowing the South Koreans to do it, it gives a green light to the North Koreans to do it as well. The problem with this thinking is that the North Koreans are doing all these activities anyway whether or not the South Koreans are doing it.
For those that don’t have access to STRATFOR I published the article below for you to read:
South Korea and the United States will open negotiations in Washington on Oct. 25 to discuss the revision of their bilateral nuclear cooperation agreement. The agreement, signed in 1974, was meant to prohibit South Korea from enriching uranium and reprocessing used nuclear fuel without U.S. permission. The pact is set to expire in 2014, and negotiations are expected to conclude by 2013. South Korean Deputy Minister for Multilateral and Global Affairs Cho Hyun and U.S. State Department Special Adviser for Nonproliferation and Arms Control Robert Einhorn will lead the delegations to the talks.
The agreement was signed amid U.S. concern over nuclear arms proliferation. Seoul’s secret attempt to begin a nuclear weapons program in the early 1970s led to U.S. suspicions about the country’s nuclear initiative, saying such an initiative would escalate tensions on the Korean Peninsula that could lead to another war. However, Seoul — increasingly reliant on nuclear energy — is finding the agreement stifling (particularly the stipulation about fuel reprocessing) and thus will attempt to renegotiate the agreement to get U.S. permission to reprocess spent fuel. The United States will have lingering concerns about this, particularly about a new spent fuel processing technology South Korea has developed and the potential increase in tensions the technology could cause on the Korean Peninsula.
Seoul has used nuclear energy to keep up with the country’s growing energy demand despite the country’s lack of natural resources. As early as the 1970s, South Korea began an ambitious nuclear power program that paralleled the country’s industrialization policy. After South Korean President Lee Myung Bak took office in February 2008, Seoul stepped up its efforts to develop nuclear energy and sought to export its nuclear technology to the world market, including a number of countries in Middle East, Southeast Asia and Europe. Seoul currently has one of the most ambitious and dynamic nuclear power programs in the world.
South Korea has said the limits imposed by the 1974 agreement with the United States — particularly the provision concerning fuel reprocessing — “excessively” impede its nuclear power program. Without the right and U.S. consent to reprocess used nuclear fuel, Seoul has claimed, facilities for storing used nuclear fuel from South Korea’s 20 nuclear power plants (not to mention the plants under construction) will reach capacity by 2016 at the current rate. Reprocessing would allow South Korea to recycle 94.4 percent of its nuclear waste as energy sources. The country also says the reprocessing is purely for industrial purposes, not for military use.
Thus, South Korea is actively seeking to adjust the agreement’s provisions when it is renewed in order to get U.S. consent to reprocess used nuclear fuel. From Seoul’s perspective, autonomy in its nuclear program is the “peaceful nuclear sovereignty” that South Korean Knowledge Economy Minister Choi Kyung Hwan said South Korea should seek after the country won a $20 billion deal to build four reactors for the United Arab Emirates in December 2009. Although the reactors to be constructed in the United Arab Emirates deal are based on a U.S. design, Seoul hoped this contract and some other deals under discussion would be important considerations in negotiations over the agreement with Washington.
One of the most contentious issues to be discussed during the upcoming meeting will be South Korea’s proposed pyroprocessing technology (dry processing), which Seoul is seeking long-term U.S. consent to use in processing spent nuclear fuel. Pyroprocessing is an electrolytic process to recover nuclear fuel from used rods. According to South Korea, the process would only partially separate weapons-grade plutonium and uranium from spent fuel and it is considered to be less capable of producing nuclear weapons. South Korea developed the technology in hopes that once the United States allows it, the process will address the nuclear waste issue in the long term. South Korea has signaled that it has every intention to pursue pyroprocessing technology; it has plans to build a pyroprocessing facility in 2011 and begin carrying out pyroprocessing fuel cycles by 2028. However, because separated plutonium from pyroprocessing would be usable in developing nuclear weapons, Washington has been extremely cautious about allowing the technology to be used in actual spent fuel.
U.S concern over South Korea’s nuclear plans comes from its broader non-proliferation efforts around the world, such as in Iran and North Korea. Washington is concerned that South Korea’s spent fuel reprocessing would provide an excuse for other non-nuclear-weapon states to take a similar approach and move closer to developing nuclear weapons. In particular, it fears that South Korea’s pyroprocessing program, should it become active, would undermine the 1992 North-South Denuclearization declaration calling for the dismantling of North Korea’s nuclear program.
Nonetheless, the United States has approved the reprocessing of U.S.-supplied nuclear fuel in Europe, Japan and India, though India is not a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. As a close U.S. ally in Northeast Asia, South Korea will push the United States hard to grant Seoul equal treatment. South Korea also could use North Korean nuclear fuel reprocessing and nuclear testing, which violated the 1992 agreement, to question its legitimacy, though it would not be able to use its threatening neighbor as an excuse to violate the agreement without arousing further U.S. suspicion. Seoul would continue insisting that its nuclear fuel reprocessing is for peaceful use.
South Korea has set a precedent of pursing commercial and military missile programs that went against Washington’s will and ultimately forced the United States to lift prohibitions. However, Seoul does not want to create another problem — particularly over an extremely sensitive issue of global concern, such as nuclear energy and proliferation — that would test its relations with Washington. Thus, in order to win Washington’s trust regarding its nuclear program, South Korea needs to put forth long-term efforts to demonstrate its sincere commitment to nuclear nonproliferation. Seoul must convince Washington that nuclear weapons have never been an option for South Korea and that there is no risk of proliferation or a great threat to the balance of power in Northeast Asia.
The eventual outcome of the upcoming talks in Washington is unclear. However, STRATFOR will monitor the negotiations closely to see whether the two sides appear to be making progress in reconciling their differences. [STRATFOR]
3:39 pm on October 27th, 2010 1
Allow the reprocessing but carefully watch it to make sure it isn't weaponized. Non-proliferation is the goal for the US, and it's perfectly reasonable for Washington to insist Seoul stay within a strict regimen in exchange for the security umbrella it's under.
7:57 pm on October 27th, 2010 2
Screw Uncle Sam. South Korea has the right to develop nuclear weapons. If the US has them, why can't South Korea? Who made the Americans the over lords of South Korea? Weren't they saying not too long ago, they were leaving soon?
8:01 pm on October 27th, 2010 3
No, Tianjin Tom, they didn't say they were leaving. In fact, they're building a huuuuuuge military base in Pyongtaek.
9:48 pm on October 27th, 2010 4
In other words, the new US strategy is to surround and contain China. This was in the Korean papers:
http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&…
The US needs Korea badly in their containment strategy – just like the US needed Korea during the Cold War against Soviet Union. The US military is not going anywhere any time soon. South Koreans should realize this and start playing hard ball to get what South Korea needs.
10:00 pm on October 27th, 2010 5
United States is only the fourth largest trading partner for South Korea. China, EU, Japan are more important trade partners for South Korea than the US – sadly. The US may have South Korea's cooperation while Lee Myung Bak's party is in power. But don't bet on that to continue if and when the other party comes to power. South Korea's economic national interest lies with Asia and Europe. As much as what everybody will talk about, the bottom line is that money and trade is the most important factor when it comes to forging alliances and cooperation.
And the bottom line is, EU, China, and Asia want to grow their trading relationship and cooperation with South Korea. Same thing can't be said of the Americans who only demands and slanders Korean efforts. This site and others are a perfect example of that.
2:01 am on October 28th, 2010 6
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Joe Revolution, Mikhail I. Mikhail I said: South Korea Negotiates for Peaceful Nuclear Sovereignty With US …: STRATFOR has published an article recently on… http://bit.ly/agApkt [...]
8:04 am on October 28th, 2010 7
Dear Idiot Tom,
Here is a little history lesson you seem to either never learned or you didn’t pay attention during the block of instruction.
Once upon a time there was a country called Japan and Japan ruled Korea, China and a lot of other 2 bit nations. Those places learned to speak Japanese, they paid taxes to Japan and their women became sex-slaves to Jap soldiers. Japan ruled the day and had a very easy time in doing so. Korea lost it’s culture during the JAPANESE RULE of their country. The Jap soldiers routinely raped the women, tortured the men and did what ever they wanted whenever they wanted. The Koreans were power-less to do anything and they CAPITULATED to the Japs.
Then came another country. That country said “hey wait a minute, Japan can’t do that crap to those countries” and they started crossing the Pacific island by island. Pretty soon that country secured an island large enough to launch these things called “Long Range Bombers” and they started fire-bombing Japanese cities. Night after night, day after day the bombers came and dropped bomb after bomb. The country did that because NO OTHER COUNTRY HAD THE POWER OR THE BALLS to do so. Pretty soon, the bombers dropped more and more and eventually TWO ATOMIC BOMBS ERASED THE LIVES OF 250,000 JAPANESE FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH. The emperor of Japan said “hey wait, if that happens too many more times, I won’t have any people left.” The emperor SURRENDERED to a country who’s location wasn’t anywhere near his country. No other country near Japan ever did anything to repel the Japs. Why? BECAUSE THEY WERE WEAK! That’s why.
You need to research how many Americans died fighting the Japs and for that matter how many Japs died trying to keep their rule over 3rd world countries like Korea. YOU STUPID LITTLE PUNK OF AN ANIMAL, HOW DARE YOU SAY ANYTHING OTHER THAN “THANK GOD AMERICA SAVED EVERY LIFE IN SOUTH AND NORTH KOREA FROM THE JAPANESE – EVERY KOREAN SHOULD BOW DOWN BEFORE EVERY AMERICAN SOLDIER BECAUSE THEY WILL DO SOMETHING NO KOREAN WOULD EVER DO: RESCUE ANOTHER NATION FROM TYRANY AND OPRESSION. THANK YOU GOD FOR AMERICANS”
8:14 am on October 28th, 2010 8
AT #7 – Lemmy
While I DO NOT believe your rhetoric would be considered acceptable in todays' version of a politically correct world, I would just like to say……… Excellent post! The core truth of the matter!
8:15 am on October 28th, 2010 9
I've never had such a good laugh in a long time, Lemmy.
The US will soon be almost out of the picture in Korea because they're losing economic influence in Asia, and it's just matter of time before the US is forced to leave Korea due to financial problems.
In the meantime, I think Korea and Russia may even get closer. Vladimir Putin's daughter will marry a young Korean man:
http://news.joinsmsn.com/article/258/4586258.html…
8:22 am on October 28th, 2010 10
P.S – Lemmy, you forget to add the little tid bit about the years 1950-1953. No one is stopping any S. Korean from taking a trip north and settling down for the long haul.
8:26 am on October 28th, 2010 11
Lemmy and Zilchy, how is that ancient history going to effect or stop America's waning, declining influence on Korea? Come on now, explain.
8:41 am on October 28th, 2010 12
#11 Two Face,
The history will not effect anything, I agree. I would also point out that your notion of "declining influence" is your own biased idea, based on some past psychological trauma, which has little relevance to the actual influence of the U.S. in regard to S. Korea.
The jury is still deliberating on the financial crisis both in the U.S. and the rest of the world. To say that China, Russia or any other country will be in any better shape in the near future is extremely shortsighted.
Are you the least bit concerned with your self-delusion?
10:00 am on October 28th, 2010 13
#12, Tom is not concerned at all, as he is in reality a female Chinese operative, or two or three. Beijing Betty is the groups name. How do we know this? No Korean could be that ignorant, is how.
BUT, I will say this: The cold war is over. Time to leave Korea. Past time. They are all grown up now. Turn their flat asss loose.
WE surely do not need Korea. If China gets out of line, we can more easily use Korea as a battle ground than we can as a base to defend.
The group of Chinese that operate under the name "TOM" make my point for me.
The "winning hearts and minds" chit didn't work in Vietnam. Hasn't worked in Korea. Making the same damn mistake in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The reason is clear. None of these piss-ant countries would act as noble as America has. They don't see it as noble and correct action because they would not act in such a way. They see it as weakness of sprit. What other country would give a country back to those that couldn't defend themselves. Name one.
America has the strength but fails to use it—as others would. America is hated/made fun of, for it's stupidity. What? Like America would do anything about WORDS. You have to attack America Physically before it will do anything (9/11). Ten years later the Left/liberals will not even SAY it was Muslims that attacked America. Hell the POTUS was raised a Muslim! Enough to make a man want to do some damage. (as in chopping wood, shooting cans and smacking the bag).
America needs to chit or get off the pot. Korea being the pot, we need to get off already.
Korea is useless as a friend to America. The only time they were usefull was in vietnam. Useless before and after. No fighting sprite at all. But I'll say one good think about Korea. It is very good at suffering. Much experience there.
10:32 am on October 28th, 2010 14
Some of Tom's recent posts actually made a little sense. But now he's back to being the Tom we've all come to know and love.
12:32 pm on October 28th, 2010 15
Ole Tanker. 16, here are the names of the guys that divided Korea at the thirty-eighth parallel: Dean Rusk and Charles Bonesteel. Google them to refresh your memory.
Retired GI 13, I agree we should stop trying to win the hearts and minds of people who don't want us around, or who aren't useful to us. But we don't have to insult them. We should just let them manage their own affairs. We can still seek their voluntary cooperation whenever it's mutually convenient.
1:29 pm on October 28th, 2010 16
I really hate to say this but I agree with ONE thing that the other Tom has to say in comment #3. I think that the ROK should have the right to develop their own nuclear weapons. No one likes the idea of more nuclear proliferation but both countries that fought the ROK during the Korean war, i.e. China & NK both have nuclear weapons. With the current administration in power & the fact that we are already in TWO WARS I can certainly understand SK possibly thinking that they may not be able to rely on us. Also perhaps the possession of nuclear weapons may give the SK some backbone in their dealings with NK & would certainly put some more restraint in the minds of the NK leadership. At some point in the future since SK is an advanced country we need to leave. SK has about twice the population of NK & an economy light years ahead so let's get out.
2:05 pm on October 28th, 2010 17
No, you guys are not getting out until we kick you out.
Just joking. 
Seriously, when do you guys think you'll be leaving? No offense, but your meddlings and demands are getting annoying, even if you are becoming irrelevant. The very thought that the United States can dictate who can have nuclear weapons and who can't is ludicrous considering that you're the biggest nuclear weapon power in the world.
6:28 pm on October 28th, 2010 18
"China, EU, Japan are more important trade partners for South Korea than the US – sadly."
You think any of those three will come to the Republic of Korea's aid when somebody is in the process of bombing Seoul to hell? Retard.
6:33 pm on October 28th, 2010 19
#14, Shift change at the Beijing Betty Project.
6:37 pm on October 28th, 2010 20
Lemmy #7.
I do believe if you go farther back in History to say around 1905 when Japan Annexed Korea at gunpoint. The Korean Governments asked America to save them.
America said, “No, you are not worth it.”
Kinda like asking someone to save you from a Bully. “Tuff luck buddy you are on your own. Don’t ask me for help.”
I am sorry my history is a little weak. But at the end of WW2, when we were trying to figure out who would take control of Japanese surrendering, didn’t someone at the Pentagon point at a random map line and say, “Here, the 38th parallel looks good,”
So, kinda, we caused North and South Korea.
What about the 10′s of thousands of Korean forced laborers the Japanese caused us to kill at places like Tarawa?
In my mind, we have an obligation to the South Koreans, to support and help.
Damn, history keeps getting in the way!! Didn’t the South Korean Army want to invade the North after we built it up circa, 1952-53. And didn’t the US Military and Government stop it? I think there was an agreement there that obligated America for protection, kind of quid pro quo.
Again, my history is a little weak, but these are points I picked somewhere, here and there
6:37 pm on October 28th, 2010 21
"Korea is useless as a friend to America. The only time they were usefull was in vietnam. Useless before and after."
Then why the hell is America masturbating in Japan and Germany and elsewhere? They were way more useless to America than Korea was before, during, and after Vietnam. Imo Korea deserves bilateral military alliance with the US a lot more rightfully than any other country who has American troops on their soil.
7:30 pm on October 28th, 2010 22
@16
Yes, You are absolutely correct your history is weak. Reading talking points and far flung conspiracy theories off Korean leftist websites definitely constitutes a weak knowledge of history.
I would go one by one and debunk every absurd assertion that you made, but you already shown you are not to interested in common sense let alone history.
8:34 pm on October 28th, 2010 23
Retried G.I. is a typical ignorant uneducated white trash who joined military because he coudln't go to college. Who cares what he thinks? LOL
9:02 pm on October 28th, 2010 24
"You think any of those three will come to the Republic of Korea’s aid when somebody is in the process of bombing Seoul to hell? Retard."
We have Putin's daughter. The Russians will help us.
9:08 pm on October 28th, 2010 25
"K", the US needs South Korea more than they let on. They do not want to see themselves pushed out of Asia. That is why they are still in South Korea. Someday I hope Seoul call their bluff and tell them leave. Americans think they are doing South Korea a free charity and expect Koreans to fall on their knees and worship the ground that they walk on. It's time they learn a lesson what could happen if they lose an important geopolitically friendly country in Asia. South Korea should use the bargaining chip and play off the Jjankes with the Yankees and get the maximum out of it.
10:05 pm on October 28th, 2010 26
Even this Korean guy agrees with me that China and Japan is getting more economically more influential than America, and that we need to pay more attention to China and Japan which are becoming much more important trade partners. Even though he says "we shouldn't be so anti American", this is a complete departure from the past where America was almost the sole focus of Korea. It is no longer the case.
http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2010/10…
My point is, with rapidly weakening economic influence America has on Korea, it will also weaken politically and militarily in Korea and Asia for that matter, as China economic influence continues to rise rapidly.
If you look at history, smaller countries follow whoever is the strongest economic super power.
7:58 am on October 29th, 2010 27
Maj America, #17, thanks for the kind words. I got in the old boxes and dusted off the old books, found "This Kind of War" by Fehrenbach, hardly left wing propaganda. I assume you have read it?
It was a "Treaty of Protection" the Marquis Ito made the Koreans sign. They sent a note beforehand to President (Teddy) Roosevelt asking for help.
8:31 am on October 29th, 2010 28
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korea_under_Japanese…
8:53 am on October 29th, 2010 29
Maj America #17, Note Korean forced Labor, not covered in above article.
Question: Did the American and British POW's build the railways in Southeast Asia, ie "Bridge over river Kwai." Voluntarily or were they "Forced labor" like the Japanese used throughout the Pacific?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tarawa
Just the FIRST battle in the Central pacific!!!
Thanks again, for helping me "brush up" on my HISTORY!!
9:29 am on October 29th, 2010 30
Ok, to the point.
I believe America and Korea have a unique relationship. Korea is a sovereign nation.
Japan and Germany, declared enemies, were defeated and occupied in war.
A lot of Americans don't, or can't see the difference!!
Korea can have Nukes if they want. America will leave, if and when asked.
My point, regarding the 38th Parallel, is America caused the orignal problem, we have a moral obligation to address the problem.
South Korea is a prosperous, thriving Democracy, we have met our obligations.
11:15 am on October 29th, 2010 31
#7,
http://www.law.ou.edu/ushistory/japsurr.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_Agreement
11:28 am on October 29th, 2010 32
http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/peaceinthepacif…
12:13 pm on October 29th, 2010 33
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Instrument_…
12:19 pm on October 29th, 2010 34
After thinking about it, I would love for the ROK to have nukes. Ever see two korean women fight each other? I have. I can see uping that to the nuke level.
Wouldn't be a "peninsula" for long. Just a bunch of Chinese and Japanese "islands".
Let them have the nukes already. 
2:18 pm on October 29th, 2010 35
@ ole tanker, I recommend reading this link about the Taft-Katsura Agreement:
http://rokdrop.com/2007/01/08/the-taft-katsura-ag…
2:33 pm on October 29th, 2010 36
"After thinking about it, I would love for the ROK to have nukes. Ever see two korean women fight each other? I have. I can see uping that to the nuke level."
Unfortunately for you ROK is ruled by a very cool-headed manly leadership. That's why ROK is where it is now.
8:49 pm on October 29th, 2010 37
Yeah, unlike Bush's America. Look what he did single handedly.
12:20 am on October 30th, 2010 38
K #36 It is not unfortunate for me. I don't give two chits if korea lives or dies. I find korea and her "manly" leadership amusing. Spent some time there, and know how it can (will) change.
Beijing Betty (tom), who was this Bush person? He must have had great power since his name keeps coming up.
Note: Korea has never done anything single handed — except suffer. Koreans know this. That is why they are so angry.
2:17 am on October 30th, 2010 39
Korea, even if it's a small country geographically, is a great nation. And it will be a greater nation in the near future. Korea's future is brighter than America who was blessed with abundance of natural resources and lots of empty land. Yet, America's future generation will be a lot poorer. It's a has been country full of people like you, Retired GI, who will be too busy trying to put food on the table.
2:53 am on October 30th, 2010 40
Beijing Betty (Project), Busy? ME! After retirement from the military, I have been very busy. Washing the car, shooting at events, lifting weights. No shortages of food here. I live good baby! I even have a few investments in some blue chip companies.
Thanks to Obama, the right will be back in power in congress in three days. Looking good here!
I would write more BB-Project, but I'm going to be very busy making a sandwich and kicking my feet up to watch the politics in play.
Sunday is full also. Big lunch with family and than FOOTBALL! I'm very busy.
7:05 am on October 30th, 2010 41
China's Fast Rise Leads Neighbors to Join Forces
Mark Landler, Jim Yardley, Michael Wines
Hanoi
New York Times
"A whirl of deal-making and diplomacy, from Tokyo to New Delhi, is giving the United States an opportunity to reassert itself in a region where its eclipse by China has been viewed as inevitable."
"Most Asian countries, even as they argue that China will inevitably replace the United States as the top regional power, have grown concerned at how quickly that shift is occurring, and what China the superpower may look like."
"And its rapid naval expansion, combined with a more strident defense of its claims to disputed territories far off its shores, has persuaded Japan, South Korea, Vietnam and Singapore to reaffirm their enthusiasm for the American security umbrella."
Etc, etc.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/31/world/asia/31ch…
7:15 am on October 30th, 2010 42
Tom, what idiotic comments you make. You have NO IDEA WHAT IT'S LIKE TO BE AN AMERICAN! Why do you spout off at the mouth like you do.
HERE IS ANOTHER FREE HISTORY LESSON FOR TOM.
Once upon a time there were AMBITIOUS, HARD WORKING, SMART PEOPLE WHO WANTED AN OPPORTUNITY BETTER THAN AVAILABLE TO THEM IN ENGLAND. THEY RISKED THEIR LIVES AND SAILED IN RICKEDY WOODEN BOATS 6,000 KM FROM ENGLAND, THEIR HOMELAND, KNOWING THEY WOULD LIKELY NEVER SEE THEIR FAMILY AGAIN. LAZY PEOPLE SAW THE SUCCESS OF THE AMBITIOUS AND ATTACHED THEMSELVES LIKE LEECHES (MUCH LIKE FOREIGNERS ATTENDING AMERICAN SCHOOLS LIKE SAHS AND UNIVERSITIES). THE AMBITIOUS, HARD WORKING, SMART PEOPLE NEVER HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT ANYTHING IN THE LAND OF GOOD AND PLENTY. THE LEECHES HAVE ALWAYS LIVED IN FEAR BECAUSE THEY NEED A HOST. TOM DO YOU NEED A HOST?
7:38 am on October 30th, 2010 43
I hope China DOES replace the USA as the top REGIONAL POWER. SOON!!
Wonder what the Korean Protest against China will look like,
Right Beijing Betty Project aka TOM
12:44 pm on October 30th, 2010 44
United States is toast!
US is bankrupt!
Us is poor!
Did you guys pay back your money to China yet? Nope. I didn't think so.
12:30 am on October 31st, 2010 45
Beijing Betty Project, the young Miss that commented in #44 is not nearly as intelligent as the others that write under the title of tom. Please bring back the inteligent ones.