Tom is now officially allowed to comment freely again so let Tom know how much you miss him in the comments section. If not then enjoy the cartoon:


Tom is now officially allowed to comment freely again so let Tom know how much you miss him in the comments section. If not then enjoy the cartoon:

| Blog: |
| ROK Drop |
Topics: |
| Korea, Japan, US Military |
Bad Behavior has blocked 15722 access attempts in the last 7 days.


2:29 am on November 21st, 2010 1
That "all over India" line is a bunch of crap.
3:51 am on November 21st, 2010 2
Tom is now officially allowed to
commenttroll freely again…There. Fixed that for ya.
Tom succeeded in taking the Japan rope-stringing incident wildly off-topic in comment #5.
8:40 am on November 21st, 2010 3
How is that wildly out of topic, Kuo Shi Bao? That case also applies to Korea because the two court systems (Japan and Korea) are very similar and the court judgement result would probably be the same, if this had happened in Korea. Then the whole gang, lead by you jumped on my back, calling me names.
10:22 am on November 21st, 2010 4
Tommy Two Face,
I still love you. I realize there's not an abundance of love on this site for someone of your intellect, but I for one am happy to see you back in action. You pretty much picked up, where you left off. I do admire your consistancy.
11:18 am on November 21st, 2010 5
Get him TOM! Get that Kuo Shi Bao.
Good to have your Chinaman self back.
11:32 am on November 21st, 2010 6
According to Wikipedia, which utilizes PC Magazine and Indiana University as resources for its definition, this is what a troll is:
Tom's first volley, comment #5, clearly meets this standard.
When he does things like this, Tom drags down the level of discourse about the topics presented at ROK Drop and in the aggregate it ends up crowding out more substantial and useful discussion.
12:14 pm on November 21st, 2010 7
I think GI Korea should consider banning Kuo Si Bao for trolling. Look at how many people who are supporting me, and yet he's the only one on a campaign to get rid of me.
It's Kuo who can't seem to stick to the subject by constantly complaining about Tom. Well, Tom is here to stay. Bad news for Kuo.
12:19 pm on November 21st, 2010 8
English teachers in Korea should be thankful that Korea is there for them. Just look at what's happening in Ireland.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/21/world/europe/21…
After reading this, I am more convinced more than ever, South Korea is a great country, which will only get better and better.
1:40 pm on November 21st, 2010 9
Tom wrote:
Except that my behavior here doesn't meet any reasonable definition or standard of trolling. Yours does.
Get rid of you? Please note the italicized clause in my comment #6. If you can participate here without trolling, things would be different (and much better).
Note also that since your return from moderation, I have not called for you to be banned. Pointing out your trolling does not only have you being banned as an outcome or intent. You, on the other hand, keep trying to get me banned, so you really have no moral ground there.
5:28 pm on November 21st, 2010 10
Here is a dubious honor for Korea. Let's see how he/she is received for his/her achievement back home.
5:38 pm on November 21st, 2010 11
JoeC, Korea invented "don't ask, don't tell." If someone insists on flaunting their sexuality, most people will try just as hard to ignore it. In short, except for some sensationalistic articles that may be the subject of 커피 자판기 for a few days, most people will pay little attention to this and only a fringe few will go nuts about it in any way.
6:37 pm on November 21st, 2010 12
Tommy Two Face – "After reading this, I am more convinced more than ever, South Korea is a great country, which will only get better and better."
Ofcourse! Have you ever stated anything to the contrary? Do you believe this statement will surprise anyone here at the Drop?
7:52 pm on November 21st, 2010 13
No, but this place needs to be reminded so that you guys don't forget.
Besides, I like rubbing it in because I enjoy it.
It's a form of payback for all the crap that I used to read on Koreans.
I guess you can say it's sweet revenge.
8:22 pm on November 21st, 2010 14
Toronto Tom wrote:
Which of the commenters here were writing "all the crap that [you] used to read on Koreans"?
8:33 pm on November 21st, 2010 15
Kushibo, it's kind of a pre-emptive payback..cause Tommy Tang Clan is psychic.
8:58 pm on November 21st, 2010 16
Kuo Si Bao is my stalker. Look how fast it took him to respond to me.
I think he waits on me day and night, waiting on me to post.
9:16 pm on November 21st, 2010 17
Tianjin/Toronto Tom wrote:
Thirty minutes. Lightning fast.
Tom, new comments to any post I've written on end up on my iPhone. Sometimes I reply to yours "fast," but I also do the same with others (I responded to JoeC in ten).
Just like in this case, I do notice you like to throw obfuscatory or off-topic responses when someone asks you questions you can't comfortably answer.
I guess answering my question would show that you're getting "sweet revenge" on a bunch of people who had nothing to do with any original insult. Which is both pathetic and trollistic.
And what's this "Kuo Si Bao" stuff? That you would try to Sinicize my Korean-language userid like that indicates you don't know what it means. Which is odd if you are a native Korean speaker.
11:56 pm on November 21st, 2010 18
Back in the good ol' days, the DoD used jet injectors and BDU boots were to be shined.
1:53 am on November 22nd, 2010 19
18, I remember in 2002 when cold weather boots were issued. The instructions for proper care of the boots stated that polish was not to be used. Something to do with the breathing of the boots. Polish would clog the pores.
Not that Military "leadership could read or understand the instructions". More shaking of my head, for the stupidity that I've seen in the ARMY.
I still have one pair that I never polished. Had to chunk the other pair.
4:10 am on November 22nd, 2010 20
"That you would try to Sinicize my Korean-language userid like that indicates you don’t know what it means. Which is odd if you are a native Korean speaker."
Of course I know what it means. It means 95 in sino Korean number.
5:33 am on November 22nd, 2010 21
Oh, I'm sure you know what "kushibo" means, now at least. It would be something you could easily ask or something you would likely have picked up in basic language training.
But I wasn't referring to your translation or lack thereof. I was referring to the way you parsed the components to Sinicize my nickname. Not the way a native Korean speaker would think to render it.
6:31 am on November 22nd, 2010 22
Well, damned if you do, and damned if you don't. There's nothing that I can do to satisfy you.
You don't exactly look so native Korean to me either.
6:45 am on November 22nd, 2010 23
Tom in Toronto wrote:
Of course not, not when you're lying about your bio. You don't have very good attention to details you can't fill in when you're actually lying about this stuff.
And no, I'm not a native Korean speaker, but I've had considerable experience utilizing my long-established userid with native KoKos, and your Sinicization was a giveaway that you're not one of them.
By the way, in Mandarin it would be Jiushiwu. No doubt you'll say that my knowledge of my userid in Mandarin is proof that I, not you, am the real Beijing agitprop, in the hope that people here will all suddenly become stupid and not recall that you, not I, am the one writing the pro-PRC crap all over the place and trying to drive a wedge between the US and South Koreans.
8:57 am on November 22nd, 2010 24
I do like the Anthrax syringe at the forefront of the tray. I'm curious, is that supposed to portray the actual bacterium itself, or the vaccination for said microbe?
9:01 am on November 22nd, 2010 25
"No doubt you’ll say that my knowledge of my userid in Mandarin is proof that I, not you, am the real Beijing agitprop"
Bingo! You have been confirmed as the Beijing agitprop.
6:24 pm on November 22nd, 2010 26
Hey guys;
did we just go to war here? (Tuesday afternoon)
7:26 pm on November 22nd, 2010 27
UPDATE FROM USFK Facebook:
U.S. Forces Korea (Official Page) You have undoubtedly been watching the news reports of North Korean artillery firing into the Northwest Islands off the coast of the Republic of Korea. I want to ensure you that this is isolated to the Northwest Island area. USFK is closely monitoring the situation and exchanging information with our ROK allies as we always do. We'll continue to keep you informed. GEN Walter L. Sharp, UNC/CFC/USFK Commander
Tom you need to come home.
7:34 pm on November 22nd, 2010 28
In advance of the North Korean shelling becoming a topic of its own, I'll put a few thoughts out.
I don't expect much from the South Korean government or any of the UN coalition nations that's any more of a response than we've seen before. Most of my interest will be to see what comes out of China.
North Korea is only allowed to get bolder and bolder because they've been getting Chinese top cover. China has been conveniently playing the we-don't-have-proof-positive-North-Korea-did-it denial card. This time North Korea felt free to blatantly expose their hand which leaves China in a very awkward position. They can no longer deny their lackey is instigating unprovoked conflict.
China now has no choice but to demonstrate their ability to hold North Korea accountable or be recognized as a tacit supporter of their actions.
9:47 pm on November 22nd, 2010 29
JoeC wrote:
I think this second attack may have changed that. It has become crystal clear that doing nothing has not stopped such attacks.
10:41 pm on November 22nd, 2010 30
The question I have each time this happens is: how unstable is North Korea for the immediate future?
I want to know about the food situation and Kim Jong-Il's health.
We've seen a ship torpedoed, advertising of the uranium program, and now a sizable artillery barrage (against a limited target).
Last year, we had to watch the nuclear test and then the ICBM test.
I see all of these things as potential signs of internal worry in the regime — worry about North Korea's survival in the near future.
And the most likely trigger points for civil war or a coup in North Korea would be a 2nd famine and the death or incapacity of Kim Jong-Il.
When NK tested both a nuke and ICBM, I thought that the next (NK-) logical step, if it did not get the kind of regime-saving international aid it would need to feed it's people and pass out bribes to regime supporters, would be —- blood-letting.
This year, we've seen two significant killing actions by the North.
I haven't been paying close attention to events for some time, but this has my curiosity up, especially since I'm in the larger kill zone now….
11:05 pm on November 22nd, 2010 31
#27, it's not that serious, LaPort.
Besides, I thought you USFK guys are to leave South Korea? When are you guys leaving?
Nothing will happen, because China is Korea's number one trading partner, accounting for half the growth.
http://koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2010/11/123_…
Now Kushibao will be all over me again now, for being Beijing agitprop.
But seriously now, going forward, who would South Korea choose in the event that they have to choose either China or the US? It doesn't take much brain matters to know that money talks over any sentimentality.
Chinese buy far more from Korea, than the US. US market for Korea is still important, but it's no longer an essential. If the US stops importing all Korean goods tomorrow, Korea will still be there, hurt yes, but still standing. United States is no longer needed for South Korea.
11:16 pm on November 22nd, 2010 32
"I want to ensure you that this is isolated to the Northwest Island area." – GEN Walter L. Sharp, UNC/CFC/USFK Commander
If that is a general's writing skill, I don't feel very assured.
11:19 pm on November 22nd, 2010 33
#31
And here I was thinking that South Korea's economic needs from the US was only secondary to their security needs.
If the US were to depart, who would be South Korea's guarantor of security in the region? China?
11:35 pm on November 22nd, 2010 34
Sure, why not China? They're our biggest customers. Why not?
6:13 am on November 23rd, 2010 35
It's better than relying on the US and have the westerners here bitching and whining and threatening to leave Korea, to intimidate Koreans.
Now that their economic power has been cut down by half, they can't say anything.
11:14 am on November 23rd, 2010 36
Agitprop Tom wrote:
The link you gave was intended as a reason why South Korea should NOT rely too heavily on China.
11:32 pm on December 10th, 2010 37
[url =http://forum.neodelight.com/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176500]Naked Kendra Sex Tape Free[/url]
Kendra Lesbian Tape
[url
refurbished computer
7:23 pm on January 18th, 2011 38
If you want to get cheapest priced products than visit our electrocomputerwarehouse.ecrater.com store today!!!!