By Andrew Bolt has the latest on out of control “Presbyterians” in Sweden:
Welcome to Rosengård in Malmö, Sweden by ArgSvenne
You can read and see even more videos at the link. It makes it perfectly understandable why Korea approves so few non-North Korean refugee applications when you see things like this happening in Europe.
2:11 am on June 26th, 2011 1
Muslims are desirable neighbors. Zionism is a good idea.
6:53 am on June 26th, 2011 2
Maybe refugees should be required to take an IQ test?
8:21 am on June 26th, 2011 3
Yep. Actually, it’s not just Sweden… the entire European Union has screwed itself. Now, for instance, Italy tries to pass on the deluge of immigrants coming to its shores to its neighbors by offering them temporary residency. The immigrants are then free to use that residency to travel thorughout the EU without restriction and cop a squat somewhere. It’s a disaster.
8:24 am on June 26th, 2011 4
I still can’t believe the Chosun Ilbo asked how Korea could be more multicultural.
http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2011/01/25/2011012501090.html
8:58 am on June 26th, 2011 5
islam is dangerous no matter how it is packaged. muslims do not assimilate into western society because islam is a theocracy and demands supremacy.
there is no radical, moderate, hijacked or any other nuanced semanticism type of islam. there is only islam which is based on the life of a murdering 8th century warlord.
the twin fogs of political correctness & ignorance must be dispersed before western society better understands this menace. even a brief review of islamic theology & history quickly exposes the deadly roots of this evil ideology.
see the links in the pdf version below for more accurate info about islam
==========
islam is a horrible ideology for human rights
5 key things about islam
1. mythical beliefs – all religions have these (faith) because its part of being a religion: having beliefs without proof until after the believer dies. the problem is people will believe almost anything.
2. totalitarianism – islam has no seperation of church and state: sharia law governs all. there is no free will in islam: only submission to the will of allah as conveniently determined by the imams who spew vapors to feather their own nests. there are no moderate muslims: they all support sharia law.
3. violence – islam leads the pack of all religions in violent tenets for their ideology & history: having eternal canonical imperatives for supremacy at all costs and calling for violence & intimidation as basic tools to achieve these goals.
4. dishonesty – only islam has dishonesty as a fundamental tenet: this stems from allah speaking to mohamhead & abrogation in the koran which is used to explain how mo’s peaceful early life was superseded by his warlord role later.
5. misogyny – present day islam is still rooted in 8th century social ethics: treating females as property of men good only for children, severely limiting their activities, dressing them in shower curtains and worse.
conclusions ??
there really are NO redeeming qualities for this muddled pile of propaganda.
islam is just another fascist totalitarian ideology used by power hungry fanatics on yet another quest for worldwide domination and includes all the usual human rights abuses & suppression of freedoms.
graphics version
http://img829.imageshack.us/img829/5792/dangero.jpg
1 page pdf version – do file/download 6kb viewer doesn’t show fonts well, has better fonts header footer links, great for emailing printing etc
http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B_UyNP-72AVKYWNiNTFlYTEtMTA1ZC00YjhiLTljMDUtMDhhNDE0NDMzNmYz
10:14 am on June 26th, 2011 6
I hope Korea doesn’t try multiculturalism.
5:37 pm on June 27th, 2011 7
Hello ‘ecks why’,
I’ve noticed your misleading and bigoted comment on various blogs and I will take some time to provide refutations to conclusions you’ve drawn about Islam. I will only respond to your attacks on the religion of Islam and on our Prophet and will leave out the ‘Muslims in the West’ debate as I doubt that will have an effect on your xenophobia.
I implore you to read the biography of the Prophet Muhammad before calling him a ‘murderous warlord’. If you had done so you would have found out the battles he fought were in defense of his people and land from enemies who wanted to destroy him. You would have found out that even during battles he practiced ethics of the highest level. He prohibited the attacking of civilians, non-combatants, women, children, elderly and monks. He prohibited attacking places of worship and destroying sources of food such as trees.
If you read about him then you would have learned that he exercised unparalleled mercy towards prisoners of war and allowed the rich among them to buy freedom and the poor were set free without having to pay. You would have also learned that after the battle with the Meccans, the people that oppressed him for a decade, he freed everyone without retribution and honoured the very people that had once mocked and tortured him.These my friend are not qualities of a ‘murderous warlord’.
As for your ’5 key aspects of Islam’,
1. Beliefs: The fundamental tenant of Islam is the belief in One God. To recognize that He alone is the creator of the heavens and earth and thus he alone has the right to be worshiped. It is also to believe in all the Prophets of God and to recognize Muhammad as His final messenger. The rationality and the simplicity of Islamic monotheism is what makes it stand out from the rest; these beliefs couldn’t be further from being ‘mystical’.
2. It is true that there is no separation of religion and the state in Islam. The sign of a true religion is that it comes with moral codes not only for the individual but for the state as a whole. It is quite misleading to call such a system ‘totalitarian’, keeping in mind the negative implications of that term. If Islam was totalitarian then it wouldn’t have allowed freedom to practice other faiths. In fact, non-muslims in an Islamic state are not even subject to shariah restrictions. For eg they are allowed to buy and sell alcohol while the muslims cannot. Also, a totalitarian system does not allow the people to choose their leader; something the Islamic electoral system mandated 1400 yrs ago.
And yes, all muslims do believe in the Shariah. 70% of the shariah deals with matters of worship; how to pray, fast, perform pilgrimage,give the annual charity etc. 20% of it deals with Business transactions with are based around the prohibition of interest. 5% percent deal with dietary laws and the remaining 5% has guidelines relating to running the state.
3. Your baseless allegation that Islam in some way promotes violence is refuted by the verse in the Quran which states that whoever takes an innocent life has taken the sin of killing all humanity and whoever saves an innocent life takes on the reward of saving all humanity (5:32). Also, the Prophet Muhammad said, “I will be the opponent of one who harms a non-Muslim, and I will speak against those whom I oppose on the Day of Judgment”. The Quran always encourages us to opt for peace as it states,“If they [your enemies] incline towards peace then you should likewise incline and place your trust in God. Surely, He hears and knows all.” (8:61)
4. This point simply demonstrates your ignorance of the Islamic sciences and history. Explaining it is beyond the scope of this response and probably that of your intellect.
5. If Islam is in fact misogynistic, then it wouldn’t have raised the status of the mother over the father. It wouldn’t would have allowed women to inherit property or own land…something that western women weren’t allowed up until the 19th century. It also wouldn’t have allowed for the freedom to choose their spouses and conduct business. Did you know that the Prophets first wife, Khadija, was a rich business woman who was 15 years his senior and who also proposed to him? Did you know this his last wife, Ayesha, was a scholar of the Islamic sciences, a military leader and an adviser to the Caliph? Obviously not; for if you knew these facts then you wouldn’t have made such horrendous allegations.
Conclusions? You are a racist ignorant who knows nothing about Islam.
Waleed
6:10 pm on June 27th, 2011 8
Waleed want to deny al taquiyyah. Which is actually called practicing al taquiyyah.
1. The Bible describes those who deny faith in God…
2. Islam is at war with all non-Islam. They pretend to be friendly until they take over and then ruthlessly exterminate those who don’t exhibit the currently approved version of Islam.
3. The Koran only counts Muslims as “people”. Unbelievers and Jews can be slaughtered by Muslims for any cause. Al Qaeda. Hezbollah. Hamas. Not to mention Munich 1972 or 9/11/2001…
4. al taquiyyah… Lying to non-believers in order to gain an advantage for Islam is rewarded by more points toward Heaven than anything but dying as a Martyr…
5. Look at how the Taliban treat women. Look at what happens to Saudi women who drive. Honor killings. etc. A certain “Prophet” also married a nine-year old girl…
Sock puppets are smelly, Waleed. Especially for folks who think toilet paper is a tool of the devil.
Christians and others don’t do themselves any favors by exaggerating the problems in allowing Islam into the government. Oor by ignoring them. It is not possible for Christians and Atheists to live in a free society ruled by Muslims.
It is possible for them to live as slaves, however.
And speaking of slaves, who do you think sold those blacks to the folks growing cotton and tobacco? White people died in droves as they tried to explore and exploit Africa. But Muslims are everywhere. And a major factor in the oppression of Africans for the last 1,000 years.
That does not let anyone else off the hook; but Islam is not a “Religion of Peace”…
7:22 pm on July 23rd, 2011 9
A terrorist killed ninety-two people in Norway. ‘Norwegians now know that a 32-year-old Christian, who railed against multiculturalism, is the principal and perhaps only suspect in the killings that occurred Friday in Oslo and at an island nearby. His name is Anders Behring Breivik,’ say Will Englund and Michael Birnbaum in the Washington Post.
7:38 pm on July 23rd, 2011 10
The Norwegian loon was an aberration, a nut case.
John Brown tortured and murdered people who were Southerners, and Ralph Waldo Emerson proclaimed on Brown’s hanging that “… the gallows would soon be as glorious as the Cross…” But John Brown was against slavery, so popular sentiment in many places absolved him of his brutality. Christian? Not very Christian to torture and murder people.
7:42 pm on July 23rd, 2011 11
They had all their attention on the notorious left hook and get floored by a devastating right.
Consider all this guy accomplished because he went against profile. He was able to buy several tons of fertilizer. He talked his way onto a private island dressed as cop to give a security briefing. Was able to call his victims to him before opening fire because he had the look of. someone they should trust.
He made a statement about multiculturalism alright. Profiling and stereotyping can kill you.
7:56 pm on July 23rd, 2011 12
11 Utter BS.
So, if he weren’t white, he wouldn’t have been able to get the fertiler, even though his business fit the use of it. I guess he was only allowed to be in that business, in Norway, because he was white, right?
So, if he weren’t white, the people on the island never would have thought he could be a cop and wouldn’t have let him on it. Ignorance.
So, if he weren’t white, the little kids would have been wary of him despite the cop uniform. Obviously because Norway is a wholly racist nation, right?
Profiling gets attacked because of 1 white male spree killer…Ignorance.
Let me put it this way — the next time a bomb goes off in front of an abortion clinic in the US or workers of it are gunned down in front, the police will make sure they focus equal attention on everybody: Just as many Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, Animists, and Atheists as they do Christians. They will also make sure an equal amount – equal down to a checklist they will proudly show the media to prevent being called profiling rasicsts – the exact number of whites as they do blacks and Hispanics and Asians, and so on. 1-for-1.
Their chance of catching the anti-abortionist radical will become almost non-existent, but people like JoeC will be able to feel so good about themselves…
8:14 pm on July 23rd, 2011 13
Or again — Now Norway has a spree killer, so I guess we can now stop labelling America’s a violent society. Forget statitics, we have this case – a spree killer with a gun in Norway – same-same…
8:52 pm on July 23rd, 2011 14
5,7,8 et al:
To be fair, all 3 Mediterranean Death Cults are not good for you or society. When people are
taughtbrainwashed from an early age to believe what iswrittenplagiarized by bronze age goat herders with their own agenda, no matter what version of “God’s Big Book of Really Bad Ideas – for dummies” humanity & reason lose./no idea what it has to do with this thread
11:06 pm on July 23rd, 2011 15
Leon LaPorte 14, the conversion of the mediaeval Scandinavians to Christianity was an experiment in multiculturalism, so your comment is on topic.
12:16 am on July 24th, 2011 16
15
4:19 am on July 25th, 2011 17
The European right rejects multiculturalism. Tim Lister of CNN has the scoop.
4:33 am on July 25th, 2011 18
A really good read is Virus of the Mind by Richard Brodie. It explains the spread of ideas (ie religion, zumba) as Memes and why certain ideas are more powerful than others – despite defying logic and disbelief. Oh, and it’s pretty entertaining too.
4:37 am on July 25th, 2011 19
Glans – I’m happy for you and imma let you finish but that’s the European FAR RIGHT. FAR RIGHT is European-speak for the equivalent of the KKK in Europe. Errr, probably not a good idea to equate the European right with the far right. It’s like saying David Duke is representative of the Republican party.