ROK Drop

Avatar of GI KoreaBy on April 10th, 2012 at 2:43 am

Veterans Angered By Proposed Increase In Tricare Fees

» by in: US Military

The Stars & Stripes has an update on the fight to increase Tricare fees for retired military personnel:

Older retirees like Air Force Master Sgt. Floyd Sears, 81, stand shoulder to shoulder with younger generations of retirees in opposing any of the higher fees being proposed for hard earned Tricare benefits.

But Sears also agrees with many retirees of his own generation that there’s something especially wrong with the Obama administration’s plan to impose a first-ever enrollment fee on 900,000 retirees age 65 and older and their surviving spouses.

The oldest among them entered service in World War II or during the Korean War.  Some completed careers with tours in Vietnam.  This older generation of retirees truly was promised free health care for life, routinely as they reenlisted, if they would serve at least 20-year careers.

“I was in Strategic Air Command and even heard [SAC Commander] Gen. Curtis E. LeMay say it.  The words came right out of his mouth,” Sears recalled from his apartment in the Armed Forces Retirement Home in Gulfport, Miss., where monthly fees charged residents are based on income.

That promise of “free care” is why these retirees fought in federal court and in Congress, aggressively in the 1990s, to have the government acknowledge it and keep it.  Even as the court fight was being lost, Congress by 2001 had approved Tricare for Life (TFL), designed to be a cost-free insurance supplement to Medicare for older retirees if they agreed to pay – or in most cases, to continue to pay – their Medicare Part B premiums.

Given that history, Sears and other elderly retirees were surprised to see a new TFL enrollment fee proposed in February as part of multi-prong initiative endorsed by military leaders to slow the growth of health costs.

“It’s just a slap in the face,” said Sears who retired in 1971 and receives $1789 a month in military retirement.  “It’s an insult, a real insult, that we would get pushed around like that.”

The TLF fee, if Congress were to agree to it, would be “tiered” based on level of retired pay.  Retirees who draw less than $22,590 a year in military retired pay would pay $35 to enroll in TFL for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1.  The fee would climb annually to reach $150 by 2016.  Thereafter it would be adjusted yearly to keep pace with the percentage rise in nationwide health care costs.

Tier 2 retirees, with retired pay from $22,590 to $45,178 a year, would see an initial fee of $75.  That would rise incrementally to reach $300 by 2016.  Tier 3 retirees, those with retired pay in excess of $45,178, would pay a $115 next October and $450 a year by 2016.  [Stars & Stripes]

You can read more at the link but the sense I get talking to retirees is not so much that they can’t pay the increased Tricare fees, it is that they don’t see anyone else making sacrifices as well to balance the government’s budget and instead see many other people expecting more hand outs.  But, maybe I’m wrong so military retirees what do you think about the proposed increased Tricare fees?

Tags: ,
  • Pops
    10:17 pm on April 10th, 2012 1

    It’s part of an multi-axis administrative and bureaucratic assault on the armed services. For all the blathering about “fairness” from the current administration, it’s plain to see a huge game of favorites is being played, with regard to defense spending cuts and the rest of the big fat bloated government.

  • Jinro Dukkohbi
    1:02 am on April 11th, 2012 2

    What do I (as a retiree) think? I think your analysis is spot-on. If there are sacrifices to be made, I’m willing to give my share, but I don’t see too many other government programs ‘giving’ as the DoD has. If things really are as bad as they are, then there should be cutbacks *everywhere* and everyone should shoulder some of that load. But my take on this is, more of the handouts, as you have stated here will keep freely flowing on the backs of military retirees and active duty as well, with all of the recent cutbacks and forced separations that are about to come down the pike. Anybody heard of any civil service pay and civil service retiree pay reform going on? Didn’t think so…

  • Fuddpucker
    4:16 am on April 11th, 2012 3

    I’m a retiree and I’m just glad I don’t have to pay whatever the average price is for complete healthcare. I think it’s about 400 a month for someone my age and right now I’m paying 20 bucks a month. Yeah, I know older people gotta pay more but man, their shit$s expensive.

    Sure, everybody wants stuff for free and they think they’re entitled to as such. Hardly anybody has any true economic common sense in this country. The reason why the govt. overspent so much in the past is because that’s what the average american does. Our govt. officials not only represent US but they ARE U.S.!

    Now it’s time to pay the piper and everybody screams if it affects them. It was an honor to serve in the U.S. Military and I’m thankful I still get what I get. God forbid we have to pay a few extra hundred bucks for something as meaningless as HEALTH CARE! Jesus what a bunch of cheap crybabies.


RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.

Bad Behavior has blocked 31599 access attempts in the last 7 days.