ROK Drop

Avatar of GI KoreaBy on March 26th, 2014 at 7:00 am

Congresswoman Speier Criticizes Handling of Sinclair Sexual Assault Case

Here is what Congresswoman Jackie Speier had to say about the result of the General Sinclair trial:

On display was a military legal system, apparently eager to show it was getting tough on sexual misconduct cases, that instead bungled the case.

On Thursday, Sinclair was sentenced. He received a reprimand and has to forfeit some pay. But he got no jail time. His sentence is a mockery of military justice, a slap on the wrist nowhere close to being proportional to his offenses.

But the Sinclair case is not typical of most military sexual assault cases. Sinclair had a three-year relationship and allegedly forced sex with a female captain under his command. The prosecution was problematic partly because the accuser may have told lies and partly because senior military officers may have brought harsher than usual charges.

We don’t want commanders feeling that they need to appear tough on sexual assault by bringing charges that aren’t warranted — just as we don’t want them sweeping them under the rug. This is another example of what happens when a system is reliant on people who are not legal experts, rather than on trained independent prosecutors. [CNN]

First question is what should he have received jail time for? Adultery and being a disgraceful leader usually causes divorce and possibly the loss of ones job, not jail time in the civilian world. Does Congresswoman Speier think former President Clinton should be in jail as well for adultery and being a disgrace like Sinclair? As I have already pointed out with other cases, these convictions usually do not lead to jail time by themselves from a court martial. It is usually more serious charges that added to adultery and inappropriate relationship charges that get you jail time. That is why I think the government travel card fraud conviction should have been something pursued more robustly to justify some jail time.

My next comment is in regards to the statement that the accuser may have told lies. No the accuser did tell lies which is indisputable. As far as bringing harsher charges, the officers in charge did this because of political pressure from special interests. Does anyone think the special interests would not be claiming the Army was covering up sexual assaults if they did not charge Sinclair with a sexual assault crime despite the lies and lack of evidence?

Here is what else the Congresswoman had to say:

Despite the problems with this particular case, we need to confront the bigger issue with the military prosecution system in cases of sexual assault and misconduct. There are an estimated 26,000 sexual assaults a year in the military — but reporting is low, courts-martial are rare and the conviction rate is less than 1%. The vast majority of sexual assault and rape cases in the military show a pattern of suppression, where if a report is made the victim fears retaliation and the loss of his or her job.

As I have stated repeatedly the 26,000 number is a fraud and not true.  Now she is saying that commander’s are suppressing sexual assault cases from going to a court martial, which McClatchey News long ago showed was not true, but she was just complaining about commander’s being overzealous in prosecuting Sinclair.  It is pretty obvious that facts no longer matter on this issue and additionally that no matter what the military does the special interests will not be happy until they get the prosecutors in charge of preferring charges like they want.  I will let others speculate why that is.

 

Tags: ,
- 1,409 views
13
  • phil cave
    7:09 am on March 26th, 2014 1

    http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2014-03-24/news/bs-ed-rape-letter-20140324_1_double-jeopardy-party-anne-arundel-county-state

  • Smokes
    7:15 am on March 26th, 2014 2

    I wonder if GI occasionally wakes suddenly at night in a cold almost PTSD’ish sweat sometimes and yells “26,000! Stop saying 26,000!” :shock:

  • Avatar of Leon LaPorteLeon LaPorte
    9:33 am on March 26th, 2014 3

    But seriously. She’s like a 34B, right?

  • Glans
    10:24 am on March 26th, 2014 4

    Leon, you mean she’s a small gas giant?

  • Judge and Jury
    9:01 pm on March 26th, 2014 5

    Isn’t there a Hindu goddess that wreaks vengeance and ‘justice’ on evil men? what’s her name?

    Re-incarnation of this Janet Reno-esque justice seeker to be used in prosecuting military misconduct and assault cases seems to be what Rep. Speier and her ilk would need before they clam up (no pun intended).

  • Louis Dechert
    9:43 pm on March 26th, 2014 6

    Whenever that 26,000 is thrown out by Congressional cows or the media, they need to be forced to admit that over 50% of those reporting were males; therefore, the Obama repeal of don’t ask. . . and the national failure to enforce the marriage act were failures leading to more sexual assaults. Don’t let the ignorant bastards have it both ways!

  • Smokes
    3:34 am on March 27th, 2014 7

    “repeal of don’t ask. . . and the national failure to enforce the marriage act were failures leading to more sexual assaults”

    You were being sarcastic right? Hopefully… :|

  • Louis Dechert
    5:11 am on March 27th, 2014 8

    Smokes, only partially,

    If the MSA went up from 3600 to 26,000 in one year, and the only change was the two things I mentioned, then the conclusion is inescapable. The stupid people can’t have it both ways–the whole argument applies or it does not.

  • Smokes
    6:40 am on March 27th, 2014 9

    Yeah but you’re ignoring X, the biggest variable of all, the number of idiots who blindly repeat that number without actually seeing how that number was derived and what it represents.

    X is growing exponentially.

  • Louis Dechert
    9:14 am on March 27th, 2014 10

    Hell Yes!! DOD probably designing a new campaign or commendation medal!! Each time you get hit on is another Oak Leaf Cluster. The possibilities are endless!

    C/S Army says this is the highest priority of all.

    Wonder what he will say as we have to fight our way in retreat OUT OF Afghanistan?

  • johnnyboy
    9:35 pm on March 27th, 2014 11

    This congresswoman is going to get voted out. I mean, she is practically BEGGING for it.

  • Leon LaPorte
    2:09 am on March 28th, 2014 12

    The real question for the group is: Would you hit it?

  • ChickenHead
    3:17 am on March 28th, 2014 13

    “The real question for the group is: Would you hit it?”

    Smokes might. He likes a man in uniform.

 

RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.

Bad Behavior has blocked 55497 access attempts in the last 7 days.