ROK Drop

Avatar of GI KoreaBy on April 11th, 2014 at 8:32 am

Comparing the Balance of Force Between China and Japan

» by in: China,Japan

Here is an interesting article that compares Chinese and Japanese military capabilities that shows the quantitative advantage the Chinese have, but the Japanese maintain a qualitative advantage in regards to capabilities to defend the disputed Senkakus, namely their naval strength:

Despite such tough talk, analysts say China’s top strategists know an armed conflict, intentional or accidental, is not in their interest and could detract from their long-term goal of expanding their regional and global power.

“The Chinese high command has got to be very prudent and cautious in terms of the launch of any kind of military operation,” said Arthur Ding, an expert on the PLA at Taiwan’s National Chengchi University.

Even without the benefit of the US security alliance, Japan currently has better training, facilities and equipment, Ding said, although the long term situation was less clear.

“Right now Japan is in better shape,” he told AFP.

Even Chinese President Xi Jinping has urged the military — which is beset by corruption, with high-ranking officers under investigation — to improve its abilities to “win battles”.   (…………)

China had approximately 2.3 million active duty troops last year compared with Japan’s 247,150, the report said. China also enjoyed huge leads in combat aircraft at 2,525 to 630, main battle tanks at 6,840 to 777 and tactical submarines at 66 to 18.

China’s defence budget was $112.2 billion last year, while Japan’s came to $51 billion, according to the report.  [AFP]

You can read more at the link, but when you look at the numbers this is why I roll my eyes every time I hear the Chinese complain about the supposed rise of right wing Japanese militarism when it is the Chinese that are resorting to militarism and just everyone else in East Asia is now participating in an arms race to defend themselves from China not the Japanese.

Tags: , ,
  • JWho
    10:00 am on April 11th, 2014 1

    Yes China’s military is very formidable and yes U.S. Military Forces will be the deciding factor if a conflict occurs..

  • John in NY
    10:34 am on April 11th, 2014 2

    2.333 million man army. How do you beat an army that big?

  • JWho
    11:00 am on April 11th, 2014 3

    2 Very Easily..With weapons of mass destruction

  • ChickenHead
    11:03 am on April 11th, 2014 4

    “2.333 million man army. How do you beat an army that big?”

    Sink their troop transports one by one when they try to go anywhere.

  • Liz
    2:58 pm on April 11th, 2014 5

    #4: Dude! You’ve played Axis and Allies. That’s my move for Japan.

    Iraq had a million man army.

  • Bob
    4:49 pm on April 11th, 2014 6


    How many of them are cannon fodder? The vast majority.

  • ChickenHead
    9:27 pm on April 11th, 2014 7

    “How many of them are cannon fodder?”

    I sure hope, if we battle the Chinese, they are fodder for something more advanced than a cannon.

  • Bob
    1:09 am on April 12th, 2014 8


    Ever been to China? I have. It was an underwhelming experience. It’s basically a third world country.


RSS feed for comments on this post | TrackBack URI

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.

Bad Behavior has blocked 31726 access attempts in the last 7 days.